On 2016-12-18 22:19:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > Shouldn't we just remove that code?
>
> What for?
I every now and then end up looking at it for a few minutes, and wonder
what the hell dld is, just to see that it's old stuff.
> It's maintenance-free
On 12/18/16 10:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
>> Shouldn't we just remove that code?
>
> What for? It's maintenance-free ... hasn't been touched since 2004.
> While I agree with you that it's *probably* dead code, it's hard to
> see much upside from removing
Andres Freund writes:
> Shouldn't we just remove that code?
What for? It's maintenance-free ... hasn't been touched since 2004.
While I agree with you that it's *probably* dead code, it's hard to
see much upside from removing it.
If we want to get into arguing whether code