Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-29 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:32 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: Thanks for the reminder - done (installed the DEB from sid, version 1.78.1). This will somehow show up in the snapshot builds, correct? So we (you? :P) can

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:32 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: Thanks for the reminder - done (installed the DEB from sid, version 1.78.1). This will somehow show up in the snapshot builds, correct? So we (you? :P) can verify after the next snapshots that it's correct? After in-depth inspection,

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 10/3/13, 7:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: Did we get around to doing this? Nope. Given my schedule between now and the release wrap, I won't have a chance to do it if I want any reasonable ability to roll it back if it fails. But if you want to ahead and get it done, go ahead :) Next

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On 10/3/13, 7:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: Did we get around to doing this? Nope. Given my schedule between now and the release wrap, I won't have a chance to do it if I want any reasonable ability to roll it

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-25 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: This will somehow show up in the snapshot builds, correct? So we (you? :P) can verify after the next snapshots that it's correct? I thought the devel docs at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/ were built on that machine?

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: This will somehow show up in the snapshot builds, correct? So we (you? :P) can verify after the next snapshots that it's correct? I thought the devel docs at

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-10-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Given that, I'm fine

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-10-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Magnus Hagander wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that version. Any objections?

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that version. Any objections? This was not done for 9.3rc1, AFAICT. Let's please do it for the next release builds. Um ...

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-08-22 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that version. Any objections? This was not done for 9.3rc1,

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-08-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that version. Any objections? This was not done for 9.3rc1, AFAICT. Let's please do it for the next release builds. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-07-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On 7/11/13 5:55 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: If it's safe to switch on the old ones as well, it sounds doable. If we need different toolchains, that's going to be a serious pain. Have you verified that it's fine with the

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-07-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: I would like to start using a newer version of docbook-xsl for the release builds. This is currently used for building the man pages. The latest release is 1.78.1 and fixes a few formatting errors. How do we do that?

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-07-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 7/11/13 5:55 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: If it's safe to switch on the old ones as well, it sounds doable. If we need different toolchains, that's going to be a serious pain. Have you verified that it's fine with the old ones as well, or are you jsut assuming? I tested it and it's fine.