Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2012-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 01:03:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in StandbyReplyMessage *except* for

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2012-08-23 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 01:03:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in StandbyReplyMessage *except* for the timestamp when the message was generated. On an active system this

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2012-08-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 01:03:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in StandbyReplyMessage *except* for the timestamp when the message was generated. On an active system this is not all that interesting, but on a mostly idle system that allows

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2011-08-16 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 13:50, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in StandbyReplyMessage *except* for the timestamp when the message was generated. On an active

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2011-08-16 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 13:50, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2011-08-16 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 13:50, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2011-08-16 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 13:50, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2011-08-16 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 16:00, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

2011-08-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in StandbyReplyMessage *except* for the timestamp when the message was generated. On an active system this is not all that interesting, but on a mostly idle system