Re: adt Makefile, was Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-02-06 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 02/01/2014 05:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> >>> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile >>> b/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile >>> >index 1ae9fa0..fd93d9b 100644 >>> >--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile >>> >+++ b/src/backend/utils/

Re: adt Makefile, was Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-02-06 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 02/06/2014 11:38 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: This whole list is a mess, and we don't even have all the range_types files following each other. Worth cleaning up? I'm actually wondering if it might be worth having some subgroups of object files and then combining them i

Re: adt Makefile, was Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-02-06 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > This whole list is a mess, and we don't even have all the > range_types files following each other. > > Worth cleaning up? > > I'm actually wondering if it might be worth having some subgroups of > object files and then combining them into $OBJS. Doesn't the MSVC build s

Re: adt Makefile, was Re: [HACKERS] jsonb and nested hstore

2014-02-06 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > On 02/01/2014 05:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> Odd, most OBJS lines are kept in alphabetical order, but that doesn't >> seem to be the case here. > This whole list is a mess, and we don't even have all the range_types > files following each other. > Worth cleaning up?