Re: [HACKERS] FWD: fastlock+lazyvzid patch performance

2011-06-24 Thread karavelov
- Цитат от Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com), на 25.06.2011 в 00:16 - > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, wrote: >> clients beta2 +fastlock +lazyvzid local socket >> 8 76064 92430 92198 106734 >> 16 64254 90788 90698 105097 >> 32 56629 88189 88269 101202 >> 64 51124 84354 84639 96362 >>

Re: [HACKERS] FWD: fastlock+lazyvzid patch performance

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, wrote: > clients beta2 +fastlock +lazyvzid local socket > 8 76064 92430 92198 106734 > 16 64254 90788 90698 105097 > 32 56629 88189 88269 101202 > 64 51124 84354 84639 96362 > 128 45455 79361 79724 90625 > 256 40370 71904 72737 82434 I'm having trouble interpreti

Re: [HACKERS] FWD: fastlock+lazyvzid patch performance

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, wrote: > I post this results because they somehow contradict with previous results > posted on the list. In > my case the patches does not only improve peak performance but also improve > the performance > under load - without patches the performance with 256 clie