Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Grittner writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So I'm inclined to propose that we set min/max to 0 and 99
>>> here.
>>
>> Something like the attached back-patched to 8.4?
>
> Works for me.
Done.
Thanks for the report, Joel!
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.c
Kevin Grittner writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I'm inclined to propose that we set min/max to 0 and 99 here.
> Something like the attached back-patched to 8.4?
Works for me.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
T
Tom Lane wrote:
> On reflection, I'm not sure that pg_restore as such should be applying any
> server version check at all. pg_restore itself has precious little to do
> with whether there will be a compatibility problem; that's mostly down to
> the DDL that pg_dump put into the archive file. A
Kevin Grittner writes:
> Oh, I just noticed that this is for the *pg_restore* code, not the
> pg_dump code, so there isn't necessarily a conflict with the docs.
> The pg_dump code does match the docs on its version check. The
> question becomes, for each supported version, what do we want to
> set
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Joel Jacobson wrote:
>
>> As reported by Andrey Karpov in his article
>> http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0227/
>> the version number is expressed in octal form 070100 should be
>> changed to 70100.
>>
>> Attached patch fixes the reported issue.
>
> This is a bug, but it's not c
Joel Jacobson wrote:
> As reported by Andrey Karpov in his article
> http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0227/
> the version number is expressed in octal form 070100 should be
> changed to 70100.
>
> Attached patch fixes the reported issue.
This is a bug, but it's not clear what the correct patch should
Yes, we got temp licence key from them and will provide full report.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> As reported by Andrey Karpov in his article
> http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0227/, the version number is expressed in
> octal form 070100 should be changed to 70100.
>
> Attac
As reported by Andrey Karpov in his article
http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0227/, the version number is expressed in
octal form 070100 should be changed to 70100.
Attached patch fixes the reported issue.
octal-typo.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hacker
