On 6 February 2013 17:43, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Here's what I think should be done:
>>
>> 1. Remove the check that prev checkpoint record exists.
>
> Agreed
Done
>> 2. Always do fast promotion if in standby mode. Remove the pg_ctl option.
>
> Disagreed, other viewpoints welcome.
Waiting for fu
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 07.02.2013 10:41, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Why would someone want to turn off safe-promote mode, assuming it was
>> fast enough?
> Because faster is nicer, even if the slow mode would be "fast enough".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3R-rtWPyJY
-Kevin
--
Sent
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> It makes me uncomfortable that we're adding switches to pg_ctl promote just
> because we're worried there might be bugs in our code. If we don't trust the
> code as it is, it needs more testing. We can analyze the code more
> thoroughly,
On 7 February 2013 09:04, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> It makes me uncomfortable that we're adding switches to pg_ctl promote just
> because we're worried there might be bugs in our code. If we don't trust the
> code as it is, it needs more testing. We can analyze the code more
> thoroughly, to ma
On 07.02.2013 10:41, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 6 February 2013 18:02, Robert Haas wrote:
So I would ask this question: why would someone want to turn off
fast-promote mode, assuming for the sake of argument that it isn't
buggy?
You can write a question many ways, and lead people towards a
conclu
On 6 February 2013 18:02, Robert Haas wrote:
> So I would ask this question: why would someone want to turn off
> fast-promote mode, assuming for the sake of argument that it isn't
> buggy?
You can write a question many ways, and lead people towards a
conclusion as a result.
Why would someone w
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> On 06.02.2013 20:02, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Simon Riggs
>> wrote:
2. I don't like demoting the trigger file method to a second class
citizen. I think we should make all functionality avail
On 06.02.2013 20:02, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
2. I don't like demoting the trigger file method to a second class
citizen. I think we should make all functionality available through both
methods. If there was a good reason for deprecating the trigger
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> 2. I don't like demoting the trigger file method to a second class
>> citizen. I think we should make all functionality available through both
>> methods. If there was a good reason for deprecating the trigger file
>> method, I could live with
On 02/06/2013 09:43 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
4. I think fast promotion should be the default. Why not? There are
cases where you want the promotion to happen ASAP, and there are cases
where you don't care. But there are no scenarios where you want
promotion to be slow,
Not true. Slow means safe
On 6 February 2013 16:36, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 21:33, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> If anyone really wants me to revert, pls start new hackers thread to
>> discuss, or comment on changes.
>
>
> Yes, I still think this needs fixing or reverting. Let me reiterate my
> my complaints:
11 matches
Mail list logo
