[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("scott.marlowe") wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 15:09, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > > On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > Of course
On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 15:09, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> > > > concurrency issues. ;-)
> > >
> >
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 15:09, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> > > concurrency issues. ;-)
> >
> > Or they're the kind that locks the entire table f
On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> > concurrency issues. ;-)
>
> Or they're the kind that locks the entire table for any given insert.
Isn't that what Bruce just said? ;^)
--
"Thomas O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems worth pointing out, too, that some SQL purists propose not
> relying on product-specific methods of auto-incrementing.
> I.e., it is possible to do something like:
> insert into foo( col, ... )
> values( coalesce( ( select max( col ) from f
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> concurrency issues. ;-)
Or they're the kind that locks the entire table for any given insert.
--
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)-
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> I deleted the first table. The sequence was deleted too, leaving the
> default of the second table referring to a non-existent sequence.
>
>
> Could this be a TODO item in 7.4, to add a dependency check when a
> sequence is set as the default without being created at the
Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
concurrency issues. ;-)
---
Thomas O'Connell wrote:
> It seems worth pointing out, too, that some SQL purists propose not
> relying on product-specific methods o
It seems worth pointing out, too, that some SQL purists propose not
relying on product-specific methods of auto-incrementing.
I.e., it is possible to do something like:
insert into foo( col, ... )
values( coalesce( ( select max( col ) from foo ), 0 ) + 1, ... );
and this is easily placed in a t
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oliver Elphick wrote:
> >> I created a sequence using SERIAL when I created a table. I used the
> >> same sequence for another table by setting a column default to
> >> nextval(sequence).
> >>
> >> I deleted the first table. The se
Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oliver Elphick wrote:
>> I created a sequence using SERIAL when I created a table. I used the
>> same sequence for another table by setting a column default to
>> nextval(sequence).
>>
>> I deleted the first table. The sequence was deleted too, leaving
Neil Conway wrote:
>
> Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This sounds like a serious bug in our behaviour, and not something
> > we'd like to release.
>
> It's not ideal, I agree, but I *definately* don't think this is
> grounds for changing the release schedule.
Hey, I'm no fan of slo
Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This sounds like a serious bug in our behaviour, and not something
> we'd like to release.
It's not ideal, I agree, but I *definately* don't think this is
grounds for changing the release schedule.
> No real issue with the nicety for newbies, but am very
Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 21:35, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 03:53, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:45, Thomas Aichinger wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I recently installed pg 7.2.3 on my linux box and discovered that
> > > > there a
This requires changing the nextval() function to be an attribute of the
sequence.
ie. sequence.nextval and sequence.currval to deal with the sequence.
It should also be on the todo list.
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:12, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 21:35, Robert Treat wrote:
> > O
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 21:35, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 03:53, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:45, Thomas Aichinger wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I recently installed pg 7.2.3 on my linux box and discovered that
> > > there are some problems with datatype serial
16 matches
Mail list logo
