Added to TODO.
---
Greg Copeland wrote:
> Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes.
> This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
>
>
> --
> Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes.
This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
--
Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copeland Computer Consulting
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Ian Barwick <[EMAIL
Tom Lane wrote:
> Ian Barwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).
>
> Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
> desires as an identifiable TODO category. There are a couple of threads
> in the pghacke
(no followup to [EMAIL PROTECTED], getting a little OT there)
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 16:54, Lee Kindness wrote:
> Ian Barwick writes:
> > Something along the lines of
> > char *PQversion(const PGconn *conn) ?
>
> Probably:
>
> int PQversion(const PGconn *conn)
Ian Barwick writes:
> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 00:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> > In the next protocol version update (hopefully 7.4) I would like to see
> > the basic version string (eg, "7.3.1" or "7.4devel") delivered to the
> > client automatically during connection startup and then available fr
Ian Barwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).
Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
desires as an identifiable TODO category. There are a couple of threads
in the pghackers archives over the last ye
(crossposting to hackers)
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 00:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the next protocol version update (hopefully 7.4) I would like to see
> the basic version string (eg, "7.3.1" or "7.4devel") delivered to the
> client automatically during connection startup and the
