On 27 August 2015 at 23:20, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:13:19AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> > wrote:
> > > Maybe there's a reasonable way to measure releases (my 8.0 is bigger
> > > than your 9.1!), but I don't think
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:13:19AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> > Maybe there's a reasonable way to measure releases (my 8.0 is bigger
> > than your 9.1!), but I don't think this is it.
>
>
> I agree with the sentiment, but I don't t
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Maybe there's a reasonable way to measure releases (my 8.0 is bigger
> than your 9.1!), but I don't think this is it.
I agree with the sentiment, but I don't think that anyone actually
thinks of it that way. Most people tend to think of a
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have run a script to count the number of "" items in the
> major release notes of each major version of Postgres back to 7.4:
>
> 7.4280
> 8.0238
> 8.1187
> 8.2230
> 8.3237
> 8.4330
> 9.0252
> 9.1
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 02:12:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have run a script to count the number of "" items in the
> major release notes of each major version of Postgres back to 7.4:
>
> 7.4280
> 8.0238
> 8.1187
> 8.2230
> 8.3237
>
I have run a script to count the number of "" items in the
major release notes of each major version of Postgres back to 7.4:
7.4280
8.0238
8.1187
8.2230
8.3237
8.4330
9.0252
9.1213
9.2250
