On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Download numbers for the installers were bordering on noise compared
to the GA builds last time I looked, double figures iirc. I don't
know about the tarballs offhand and can't check ATM.
Can you check when you get a
On 9/12/11 2:23 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Note that these are only numbers from people who click through the
flags pages on the website. We don't have numbers for people who
download directly from the FTP site or a mirror.
I'd say that 1200 downloads of each alpha is pretty significant. If
even
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Download numbers for the installers were bordering on noise compared
to the GA builds last time I looked, double figures iirc. I don't
know about the
On mån, 2011-09-12 at 10:00 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I certainly think there is value in pushing an alpha release after
CF4, and maybe even after CF3.
Yes, that makes sense. Although I was surprised to see that the
download numbers dropped off significantly for the later alphas.
Whether or
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On mån, 2011-09-12 at 10:00 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I certainly think there is value in pushing an alpha release after
CF4, and maybe even after CF3.
Yes, that makes sense. Although I was surprised to see that the
Writing the release notes is really the main part of the work. Bundling
the release takes 15 minutes, writing the announcement takes 15 minutes
(copy and paste), writing the release notes takes about 2 days.
Yeah, but this shaved a lot of effort/delay off doing the final release
notes.
On mån, 2011-09-12 at 09:43 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Writing the release notes is really the main part of the work. Bundling
the release takes 15 minutes, writing the announcement takes 15 minutes
(copy and paste), writing the release notes takes about 2 days.
Yeah, but this shaved a
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On m?n, 2011-09-12 at 09:43 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Writing the release notes is really the main part of the work. Bundling
the release takes 15 minutes, writing the announcement takes 15 minutes
(copy and paste), writing the release notes takes about 2 days.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On m?n, 2011-09-12 at 09:43 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Writing the release notes is really the main part of the work. Bundling
the release takes 15 minutes, writing the announcement takes 15
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 16:49 +0300, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
...
Ok, so if noone is willing to produce alpha's (which is sad), we need to
change the text in here:
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/alpha
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On tis, 2011-09-06 at 17:25 +0300, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
Oh, what if noone will be interested in packaging until the last
commitfest?
Then nothing will happen.
We need people to start testing features, without having to use git or
such.
You can download daily snapshot tarballs.
--
Sent
On tis, 2011-09-06 at 13:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
2011/9/6 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
We talked about it on core and no one seems interested in doing the
packaging. :-(
Well I don't
On tis, 2011-09-06 at 11:41 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
I think the alphas have been extremely valuable for testing.
That's not my recollection. Obviously, it's hard to measure this one
way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of test reports
from people who are not already
That's not my recollection. Obviously, it's hard to measure this one
way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of test
reports
from people who are not already contributors and could have used some
other way to get the code.
Do we have download stats for the alphas? Dave?
On 09/10/2011 02:52 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tis, 2011-09-06 at 11:41 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
I think the alphas have been extremely valuable for testing.
That's not my recollection. Obviously, it's hard to measure this one
way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of
On Saturday, September 10, 2011, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
That's not my recollection. Obviously, it's hard to measure this one
way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of test
reports
from people who are not already contributors and could have used some
other way
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 22:52, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
but I don't recall there being a lot of test reports
from people who are not already contributors and could have used some
other way to get the code.
I, for one, do use alpha tarballs on my dev machines (when working on
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tis, 2011-09-06 at 11:41 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
I think the alphas have been extremely valuable for testing.
That's not my recollection. Obviously, it's hard to measure this one
way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of test
Download numbers for the installers were bordering on noise compared
to the GA builds last time I looked, double figures iirc. I don't
know about the tarballs offhand and can't check ATM.
Can you check when you get a chance? I know that the DL numbers for the first
alphas were very low,
On lör, 2011-09-10 at 23:29 +0300, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
I, for one, do use alpha tarballs on my dev machines (when working on
apps that use PostgreSQL). It gives me a concrete schedule to update
them that's not too frequent and I can tell whether they need updating
just by glancing at the
On lör, 2011-09-10 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Of course, this means that just building a source tarball marked
alpha1 isn't real useful. If we're going to do alpha releases, we
have to have buy-in from packagers (or at least from the Windows
installer team) to do follow-on package
Hi,
Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
We talked about it on core and no one seems interested in doing the
packaging. :-(
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 10:06 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Devrim GNDZ wrote:
Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
We talked about it on core and no one seems interested in doing the
packaging. :-(
Oh, what if noone will be interested in packaging until the
2011/9/6 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
We talked about it on core and no one seems interested in doing the
packaging. :-(
Well I don't particularly mind pushing a tag and bundling it, but I
guess the
Robert Haas wrote:
2011/9/6 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
We talked about it on core and no one seems interested in doing the
packaging. ?:-(
Well I don't particularly mind pushing a tag and
Yes, it has always been a time vs. value question. I am not sure how I
feel on the matter but I am away too often to help anyway.
I think the alphas have been extremely valuable for testing. And with
some of the stuff going into CF1 and CF2 for 9.2, we really need some
early testing.
Or, to
27 matches
Mail list logo
