Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sure, and stamping. How far back do you want to go?
>
> We might as well go back to 7.3 --- I saw Teodor back-patched some of
> his contrib/ltree fixes that far.
>
Back branches are ready for release.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL
:((
Patch doesn't work.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, pl
Hmm. Not entirely sure. These are all in the SSL codepath. Are you using
SSL on the machine? Does the problem go away if you don't? (I was
No, we don;t use SSL.
The normal way is that pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket is called from
pgwin32_send(), which will always have made the attempt to send dat
> Analyzing locking state, lock occurs when backend wants to send
> data to stat collector. So state is:
> backend waits FD_WRITE event, stat collector waits FD_READ.
>
> I suspect follow sequence of events in backend:
> 0 Let us work only with one socket, and socket associated with
> statically
>
Analyzing locking state, lock occurs when backend wants to send data to stat
collector. So state is:
backend waits FD_WRITE event, stat collector waits FD_READ.
I suspect follow sequence of events in backend:
0 Let us work only with one socket, and socket associated with statically
defined eve
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Oleg Bartunov writes:
We, probably, have one patch for 8.1 stable branch which seems
helped with locking on SMP Windows setup. I'm currently testing it and
it looks good.
Cool, what's the patch?
Unfortunately, after several hours of testing I just got th
Oleg Bartunov writes:
> We, probably, have one patch for 8.1 stable branch which seems
> helped with locking on SMP Windows setup. I'm currently testing it and
> it looks good.
Cool, what's the patch?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Agreed we need to push out the back branch releases. Let me know what I
can do to help.
Making up the release notes is the only large bit of work ... do you
want to do that?
FYI to the rest of you: we're planning
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sure, and stamping. How far back do you want to go?
We might as well go back to 7.3 --- I saw Teodor back-patched some of
his contrib/ltree fixes that far.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Agreed we need to push out the back branch releases. Let me know what I
> > can do to help.
>
> Making up the release notes is the only large bit of work ... do you
> want to do that?
Sure, and stamping. How far back do you want to
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Agreed we need to push out the back branch releases. Let me know what I
> can do to help.
Making up the release notes is the only large bit of work ... do you
want to do that?
FYI to the rest of you: we're planning back-branch releases before 8.2
final
Agreed we need to push out the back branch releases. Let me know what I
can do to help.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---(end of broadcast)-
12 matches
Mail list logo
