On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:20:59 -0500 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
The reason for my question is: PHP (yes *grumble*) does not recognize
boolean columns but instead makes a simple string from a PG boolean.
So every time you select a boolean column in PHP, you
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:20:59 -0500 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
The reason for my question is: PHP (yes *grumble*) does not recognize
boolean columns but instead makes a simple string from a PG boolean.
So every time you select
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:52:15 -0500 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:20:59 -0500 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
This PHP driver is in use since years, do you really expect they will
fix this bug and make thousands of applications fail? Everyone like
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
i considered this one but this would only bring 0/1 as input, not as
output values, which is what i want.
er, what? This domain would have input and output values of 0/1.
Yes, but i will loose 't', 'true', 'f' and 'false', the usual input
values in
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:39:29 -0500 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
i considered this one but this would only bring 0/1 as input, not as
output values, which is what i want.
er, what? This domain would have input and output values of 0/1.
Yes, but i
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
Andrew: your workaround was to create a domain which would use
0/1 ... this idea will not behave like a boolean, because it does not
accept 'true'/'false'.
My replacement boolean type does accept all this input values and does
emit 0/1 instead of 'f'/'t'. But
Hello,
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:11:45 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think you'd really need a separate type. But have you considered
something simple like
CREATE DOMAIN boolint AS int CHECK (value = 0 OR value = 1)
i considered this one but this
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:11:45 -0500 Tom Lane wrote
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think you'd really need a separate type. But have you considered
something simple like
CREATE DOMAIN boolint AS int CHECK (value = 0 OR value = 1)
i
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:12:33 -0500 Mark Mielke wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
The reason for my question is: PHP (yes *grumble*) does not recognize
boolean columns but instead makes a simple string from a PG boolean.
So every time you select a boolean column in PHP, you cannot use
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
The reason for my question is: PHP (yes *grumble*) does not recognize
boolean columns but instead makes a simple string from a PG boolean.
So every time you select a boolean column in PHP, you cannot use
expressions like:
if (!$bool)
because 't' and 'f' give
Hello all,
i'm in the need to create a boolean datatype which returns an integer
instead of the usual 't'/'f'. Before anyone starts to point me at
casts: it's a lot overhead to cast some hundred occurances beside the
source of trouble, if you forget one.
And so i asked myself, if there is an
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
Hello all,
i'm in the need to create a boolean datatype which returns an integer
instead of the usual 't'/'f'. Before anyone starts to point me at
casts: it's a lot overhead to cast some hundred occurances beside the
source of trouble, if you forget one.
Do
If you reduce your code you will have to leverage the bool data type.
Why dont you provide a cast, I dont see an overhead in typbyval datatypes.
On Dec 25, 2007 9:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
Hello all,
i'm in the need to create a
Hello,
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:10:25 -0500 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
i'm in the need to create a boolean datatype which returns an integer
instead of the usual 't'/'f'. Before anyone starts to point me at
casts: it's a lot overhead to cast some hundred
Hello,
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 22:12:23 +0500 imad wrote:
Why dont you provide a cast, I dont see an overhead in typbyval datatypes.
I already have a cast from my type to PGs internal boolean ... or what
do you mean?
Kind regards
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:10:25 -0500 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
i'm in the need to create a boolean datatype which returns an integer
instead of the usual 't'/'f'. Before anyone starts to point me at
casts: it's a lot
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think all you need to do it this:
Take the code for boolout() in src/backend/utils/adt/bool.c, adjust it
and and make it a new function boolout2. Use pgxs to make it a loadable
module.
Then load it and adjust the catalog entry for the bool type to
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think all you need to do it this:
Take the code for boolout() in src/backend/utils/adt/bool.c, adjust it
and and make it a new function boolout2. Use pgxs to make it a loadable
module.
Then load it and adjust the catalog entry
18 matches
Mail list logo
