Re: [HACKERS] CSVlog vs tabs

2007-06-17 Thread Andrew Dunstan
FAST PostgreSQL wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Now that we've fixed the partial/interleaved log line issue, I have returned to trying toi get the CSV log patch into shape. Sadly, it still needs lots of work, even after Greg Smith and I both attacked it, so I am now going through it with a f

Re: [HACKERS] CSVlog vs tabs

2007-06-17 Thread FAST PostgreSQL
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Now that we've fixed the partial/interleaved log line issue, I have returned to trying toi get the CSV log patch into shape. Sadly, it still needs lots of work, even after Greg Smith and I both attacked it, so I am now going through it with a fine tooth comb. One issu

Re: [HACKERS] CSVlog vs tabs

2007-06-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One issue I notice is that it mangles the log message to add a tab > character before each newline. We do this in standard text logs to make > them more readable for humans. but the whole point of having CSV logs is > to make them machine readable, an

Re: [HACKERS] CSVlog vs tabs

2007-06-15 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Now that we've fixed the partial/interleaved log line issue, I have returned to trying toi get the CSV log patch into shape. Sadly, it still needs lots of work, even after Greg Smith and I both attacked it, so I am now going through it with a fine tooth comb. One issue

[HACKERS] CSVlog vs tabs

2007-06-15 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Now that we've fixed the partial/interleaved log line issue, I have returned to trying toi get the CSV log patch into shape. Sadly, it still needs lots of work, even after Greg Smith and I both attacked it, so I am now going through it with a fine tooth comb. One issue I notice is that it ma