Did we decide that "most NetBSD/i386 users have fpus" in which case Marko's
patch should be applied?
Cheers,
Patrick
(just checked, it isn't in today's cvs)
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 10:27:44PM +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 07:58:04PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
On Fri,
Okay, here are my results:
Box 1: C180 (2.0 PA8000), HPUX 10.20
Compile with gcc: all tests pass
Compile with cc: two lines of diffs in geometry (attached)
Box 2: 715/75 (1.1 PA7100LC), HPUX 10.20
Compile with gcc: all tests pass
Compile with cc: all tests pass
I haven't had time
Giles Lean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure how interesting these differences are anymore -- is there
anyone familiar enough with floating point to determine if the results
are acceptable (although currently unexpected :-) or not?
Differences in the last couple of decimal places in the
Hi
I've been running RC3 regression tests, starting with a FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
and a Solaris 7 Sparc box. Both tests ran without any problems. I tried
Solaris 8 Sparc next: it still suffered from the same unix socket problems.
I had a look at the code and it seems to me that the use of unix
Marko Kreen writes:
OK: Linux 2.4.2 i686 / gcc 2.95.2 / Debian testing/unstable
no problems.
OK?: NetBSD 1.5 i586 / egcs 2.91.66 / (netbsd-1-5 from Jan)
netbsd FAILED the geometry test, diff attached, dunno if its
critical or not.
Can you check whether it matches any of the other
Hi all,
Vince asked me to forward this here.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Original Message
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:45:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Justin Clift [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 26
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
OK, here is my current platform list taken from the -hackers list and
from Vince's web page. I'm sure I've missed at least a few reports, but
please confirm that platforms are actually running and passing
regression tests with recent betas or the
Two more for the list (not a single regression test failing, which is a
first on Alpha!)
Tru64 4.0G Alpha cc-v6.3-129 7.1 2001-03-28
Tru64 4.0G Alpha gcc-2.95.1 7.1 2001-03-28
I updated the regression test database as well.
Adriaan
---(end of
Tom Lane writes:
The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up. That
depends on memcmp. I seem to recall something about memcmp not being
8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone?
Sure enough:
- Macro: AC_FUNC_MEMCMP
If the `memcmp' function is not
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane writes:
The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up. That
depends on memcmp. I seem to recall something about memcmp not being
8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone?
Sure enough:
- Macro:
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up. That
depends on memcmp. I seem to recall something about memcmp not being
8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone?
Good point. From the man page of memcmp(3) on this
Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22 Mar 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrd wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind Glomsrd) writes:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If a platform you are running on is not listed, make sure it gets
included!
Red
On 23 Mar 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22 Mar 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) writes:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If a platform you are
Hi all,
I've built 7.1beta6 on a number of different HP-UX platforms (11.00 32
bit, 11.00 64 bit, 11i 32 bit).
1. On all these platforms 'make check' hung. Since that's not
critical to whether PostgreSQL works or not I worked around it by
using a different shell:
gmake
Giles Lean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll look at this next week. If someone can confirm that
/usr/bin/sh works for make check on HP-UX 10.20 that would be
useful.
It does not work. See FAQ_HPUX.
2. I saw two different sets of output for geometry.out. These seem to
relate to
Giles Lean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It does not work. See FAQ_HPUX.
I'm confused: I don't see anything about shells or make check hanging
in doc/FAQ_HPUX. There is clear instruction to use GNU make, which I
am doing.
Hm, I thought I had updated that before beta6. What it has now is
The
I'll look at this next week. If someone can confirm that
/usr/bin/sh works for make check on HP-UX 10.20 that would be
useful.
It does not work. See FAQ_HPUX.
I'm confused: I don't see anything about shells or make check hanging
in doc/FAQ_HPUX. There is clear instruction
Results of 'make check':
NetBSD-1.5/i386 one spurious floating point test failure
(mail sent to postgresql-bugs with details)
NetBSD_1.5/alphaall tests passed
NetBSD-1.4.2/i386 four tests fail
timestamp... FAILED
OK: Linux 2.4.2 i686 / gcc 2.95.2 / Debian testing/unstable
no problems.
OK?: NetBSD 1.5 i586 / egcs 2.91.66 / (netbsd-1-5 from Jan)
netbsd FAILED the geometry test, diff attached, dunno if its
critical or not.
--
marko
*** ./expected/geometry-positive-zeros.out Wed Mar 21 15:07:12
PS: AFAIK geometry-positive-zeros-bsd works for all NetBSD platforms - the
above difference is only for i386 + fpu.
It doesn't on NetBSD-1.5/alpha -- there geometry-positive-zeros is
correct.
Regards,
Giles
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 10:27:44PM +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 07:58:04PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
AFAIK geometry-positive-zeros works for all NetBSD platforms - the
above difference is only for i386 + fpu.
Seems that following patch is needed. Now It Works
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 06:25:50AM +1100, Giles Lean wrote:
PS: AFAIK geometry-positive-zeros-bsd works for all NetBSD platforms - the
above difference is only for i386 + fpu.
It doesn't on NetBSD-1.5/alpha -- there geometry-positive-zeros is
correct.
Sorry, that should have read:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If a platform you are running on is not listed, make sure it gets
included!
Red Hat Linux, Wolverine Beta (and some updates) - glibc 2.2.2,
2.4.2ish kernel (read: lots of fixes), gcc 2.96RH: All 76 tests passed
with 7.1beta6 (parallel_schedule).
Seems that following patch is needed. Now It Works For Me (tm).
Giles, does the regress test now succed for you?
Yes, but I don't like that it is 1.5 specific. I expect that later
NetBSD/i386 releases will also have the "new" floating point behaviour
by default, subject to /etc/ld.so.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind Glomsrd) writes:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If a platform you are running on is not listed, make sure it gets
included!
Red Hat Linux, Wolverine Beta (and some updates) - glibc 2.2.2,
2.4.2ish kernel (read: lots of fixes), gcc 2.96RH:
On 22 Mar 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) writes:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If a platform you are running on is not listed, make sure it gets
included!
Red Hat Linux, Wolverine Beta (and some updates) -
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! FATAL 2: ZeroFill(logfile 0 seg 1) failed: No such file or directory
! pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
Is it possible you ran out of disk space?
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! FATAL 2: ZeroFill(logfile 0 seg 1) failed: No such file or directory
! pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
Is it possible you ran out of disk space?
Probably not.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
---(end of
Hi,
I reported Linux RedHat 6.2 - 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST
2000 i686
2 cpu - 1Go RAM
Gilles DAROLD
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
Hi,
I am currently testing beta6 on AIX 4.3.3 on a RS6000 H80 with 4 cpu and 4
Go RAM
I use :
./configure
--with-CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc
--with-includes=/usr/local/include
--with-libraries=/usr/local/lib
All seem to be ok, There just the geometry failure in regression
I see nobody did a test of 7.1 on Linux 2.4.x ?
Would be nice to certify it is running on kernel 2.4.x as they claim this
is entreprise strength kernel...
Cheers.
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
AIX 4.3.2 RS6000 7.0 2000-04-05, Andreas Zeugswetter
Compaq Tru64 5.0 Alpha 7.0 2000-04-11, Andrew
Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would be nice to certify it is running on kernel 2.4.x as they claim this
is entreprise strength kernel...
Lamar, if you send me your SRPM I can do that...
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrd
Red Hat, Inc.
---(end of
* Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010321 21:29]:
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! FATAL 2: ZeroFill(logfile 0 seg 1) failed: No such file or directory
! pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
Is it possible you ran out of
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! FATAL 2: ZeroFill(logfile 0 seg 1) failed: No such file or directory
! pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
Is it possible you ran out of disk space?
Probably not.
The reason I was
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:31:03PM +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
I see nobody did a test of 7.1 on Linux 2.4.x ?
Would be nice to certify it is running on kernel 2.4.x as they claim this
is entreprise strength kernel...
I've been running the 7.1 betas on 2.4 for weeks without any
OK, here is my current platform list taken from the -hackers list and
from Vince's web page. I'm sure I've missed at least a few reports, but
please confirm that platforms are actually running and passing
regression tests with recent betas or the latest release candidate.
If a platform you are
* Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010320 20:04]:
OK, here is my current platform list taken from the -hackers list and
from Vince's web page. I'm sure I've missed at least a few reports, but
please confirm that platforms are actually running and passing
regression tests with recent betas
mklinux PPC750 7.0 2000-04-13, Tatsuo Ishii
I got core dump while running the parallel regression test of beta6.
Will look at...
--
Tatsuo Ishii
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
Compaq Tru64 5.0 Alpha 7.0 2000-04-11, Andrew McMurry
We've got 7.0.3 and 7.1b4 running on
Compaq Tru64 4.0G Alpha
Will do the regression test once RC1 is out.
Adriaan
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
mklinux PPC750 7.0 2000-04-13, Tatsuo Ishii
I got core dump while running the parallel regression test of beta6.
Will look at...
--
Tatsuo Ishii
VACUUM;
! FATAL 2: ZeroFill(logfile 0 seg 1) failed: No such file or directory
! pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel
40 matches
Mail list logo
