Re: [HACKERS] Combinations of pg_strdup/free in pg_dump code

2016-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier  writes:
> While reading some code of pg_dump, I noticed that the following
> pattern is heavily present:
> lanname = pg_strdup(stuff)
> free(lanname);

> When pg_strdup or any pg-related allocation routines are called, I
> think that we should use pg_free() and not free(). It does not matter
> much in practice because pg_free() calls actually free() and the
> latter per the POSIX spec should do nothing if the input pointer is
> NULL (some version of SunOS that crash on that actually :p), but we
> really had better be consistent in the calls done. Thoughts?

I do not think this is worth troubling over, really.  If there are
places that are relying on free(NULL) to work, it might be worth
ensuring they go through pg_free; but the pattern you show here
is perfectly safe.  We have other things to do besides create
code churn for this.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] Combinations of pg_strdup/free in pg_dump code

2016-03-28 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all,

While reading some code of pg_dump, I noticed that the following
pattern is heavily present:
lanname = pg_strdup(stuff)
free(lanname);

One example is for example that:
lanname = get_language_name(fout, transforminfo[i].trflang);
if (typeInfo && lanname)
appendPQExpBuffer(&namebuf, "%s %s",
  typeInfo->dobj.name, lanname);
transforminfo[i].dobj.name = namebuf.data;
free(lanname);
And get_language_name() uses pg_strdup() to allocate the string freed here.

When pg_strdup or any pg-related allocation routines are called, I
think that we should use pg_free() and not free(). It does not matter
much in practice because pg_free() calls actually free() and the
latter per the POSIX spec should do nothing if the input pointer is
NULL (some version of SunOS that crash on that actually :p), but we
really had better be consistent in the calls done. Thoughts?
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers