It seems that the task of fetching next n results without moving the cursor
seems like too complicated to implement for any query that has
even a little bit of complication in it...
--- On Wed, 12/21/11, Robert Haas wrote:
> From: Robert Haas
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cursor behavio
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:44 AM, amit sehas wrote:
> It seems that the task of fetching next n results without moving the cursor
> seems like too complicated to implement for any query that has
> even a little bit of complication in it...
I think that's probably true. It would also be expensiv
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:15 PM, amit sehas wrote:
> I had a question about the cursor internals implementation. When you Fetch
> next 'n' results without moving the cursors, is this kind of functionality
> implemented by firstly executing the whole query and then moving the cursor
> over the r
HI,
I had a question about the cursor internals implementation. When you Fetch next
'n' results without moving the cursors, is this kind of functionality
implemented by firstly executing the whole query and then moving the cursor
over the results, or are the movements done on active database lo
