> Did this ever get applied? If so, I can't find it.
No, my bad, I simply forgot about it, sorry.
Will work on this now.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: m
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Kevin Grittner ?rta:
> > Michael Meskes wrote:
> >
> >> All prior ECPG versions were fine because dynamic cursor names
> >> were only added in 9.0. Apparently only this one place was
> >> missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not such a
> >> major one
Boszormenyi Zoltan writes:
> Alvaro Herrera Ãrta:
>> Since we're still in the beta phase, it makes sense to apply the fix
>> right now so that it appears in 9.0. No point in waiting for 9.0.1.
> It boils down to the fact that Michael doesn't have too much time
> and no one else knows ECPG in de
Alvaro Herrera írta:
> Excerpts from Michael Meskes's message of jue ago 05 05:39:46 -0400 2010:
>
>> Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG
>> versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0.
>> Apparently only this one place was missed. S
Excerpts from Michael Meskes's message of jue ago 05 05:39:46 -0400 2010:
> Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG
> versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0.
> Apparently only this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new
> f
Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG versions
were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. Apparently only
this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not
such a major one that it warrants the complete removal IMO. I'
Kevin Grittner írta:
> Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>> All prior ECPG versions were fine because dynamic cursor names
>> were only added in 9.0. Apparently only this one place was
>> missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not such a
>> major one that it warrants the complete removal I
Michael Meskes wrote:
> All prior ECPG versions were fine because dynamic cursor names
> were only added in 9.0. Apparently only this one place was
> missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not such a
> major one that it warrants the complete removal IMO. I'd prefer to
> fix this in
Michael Meskes wrote:
> I'd consider this a bug.
Could you explain why? The assertions that people consider it a bug
without explanation of *why* is confusing for me.
It sounds more like a feature of the ECPG interface that people
would really like, and which has been technically possible s
Kevin Grittner írta:
> Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>
>> attached is a patch that adds the missing feature
>>
>
>
>> I certainly feel that this should be applied to 9.0 as a bugfix.
>>
>
> Those two statements seem to contradict one another.
PostgreSQL 8.3 or so added WHERE C
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> attached is a patch that adds the missing feature
> I certainly feel that this should be applied to 9.0 as a bugfix.
Those two statements seem to contradict one another. Is there some
bug manifestation beyond an unimplemented feature this fixes?
Without this, is
Hi,
attached is a patch that adds the missing feature to use
"WHERE CURRENT OF :curname" in UPDATE and
DELETE statements via ECPG. I used the current CVS MAIN
but also applies almost cleanly to 9.0beta4. I certainly feel that
this should be applied to 9.0 as a bugfix.
The execute.c changes were r
12 matches
Mail list logo
