On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Hrm, guess it's been too long since I've been subscribed to -current. I
know they're still working bugs out of 5.x, but I attributed that to the
major changes made. One of the big reasons I've been such a fan of FBSD
is the technical direction was set by a g
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:27:09PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:42:51AM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> >>>They complain about release delays and the challenge of organizing
> >>>volunteers, just like us.
> >>
> >>Is the
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:42:51AM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
They complain about release delays and the challenge of organizing
volunteers, just like us.
Is there any volunteer organization that's any different? :-)
FreeBSD doesn't seem to suffer much
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:42:51AM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > They complain about release delays and the challenge of organizing
> > volunteers, just like us.
>
> Is there any volunteer organization that's any different? :-)
FreeBSD doesn't seem to suffer much from either issue. Then aga
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:00:48 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I read the following report from the NetBSD group:
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/4680
>
> It has some interesting points. First, they analyze how the fit with
> other open source database offerings. Their position is somewh
I read the following report from the NetBSD group:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/4680
It has some interesting points. First, they analyze how the fit with
other open source database offerings. Their position is somewhat
similar to ours.
Their development style is also similar to ours.
Th
