Marcel Kornacker did implement concurrency for GiST - I confirmed as
much with Joe Hellerstein (his advisor). I know there's a paper he
wrote with C.Mohan on it. I don't know which version his
implementation was for.
The 7.4 GiST docs have a link to Kornacker's thesis that details how to
implement
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:47, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> > "Mike" == Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mike> Robert Treat wrote:
>
> >> While some form of bitmapped indexing would be cool, other ideas might
> >> be to implement different buffer manager strategies. I
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 12:16, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> > "Robert" == Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robert> allowing indexes for searching nulls, or adding
> Robert> concurrency to GIST, or allowing non btree indexes to
>
> Oh this has come up before on -hackers and
> "Robert" == Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> allowing indexes for searching nulls, or adding
Robert> concurrency to GIST, or allowing non btree indexes to
Oh this has come up before on -hackers and I've been meaning to chime
in.
Marcel Kornacker did implement concu
> "Mike" == Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> Robert Treat wrote:
>> While some form of bitmapped indexing would be cool, other ideas might
>> be to implement different buffer manager strategies. I was impressed by
>> how quickly Jan was able to implement ARC over
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 17:31, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> > "Mike" == Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike> How about extra credit for PITR?
>
> One step at a time :-)
>
> Actually a big problem is figuring out new pieces for the
> projects. Most of the items in the TODO list
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 17:31, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>>
>>One step at a time :-)
>>
>>Actually a big problem is figuring out new pieces for the
>>projects. Most of the items in the TODO list are way too much for a
>>class project - we gave 'em 3 weeks to make the Hash Gr
> "Greg" == Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greg> I think you're talking about situations like "where x = ? or
Greg> y = ?" or "where x = ? and y = ?"
Greg> When both `x' and `y' are indexed. It's possible to do the
Greg> index lookup, gather a list of tid pointers in
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:31:03PM -0800, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>
> > Another thing I toyed with was having an implementation of a
> > Tid-List-Fetch .. sorting a TID-list from an index and fetching the
> > records of the relation off the sorted
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:31:03PM -0800, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> Another thing I toyed with was having an implementation of a
> Tid-List-Fetch .. sorting a TID-list from an index and fetching the
> records of the relation off the sorted list for better IO
> performance. AFAICT something li
> "Chris" == Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> PostgreSQL most definitely works great on Solaris x86 ! At UC
>> Berkeley, we have our undergraduate students hack on the
>> internals of PostgreSQL in the upper-division "Introduction to
>> Database Systems"
PostgreSQL most definitely works great on Solaris x86 !
At UC Berkeley, we have our undergraduate students hack on the
internals of PostgreSQL in the upper-division "Introduction to
Database Systems" class ..
http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs186/
Hi Sailesh,
You know what would be kind of coo
> "Mike" == Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> Robert Treat wrote:
>> http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs186/hwk0/index.html
>>
>> Are these screenshots of PgAccess on Mac OSX?
Yup .. that's from Joe Hellerstein, who was the instructor in the
Spring when I was a
Robert Treat wrote:
> http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs186/hwk0/index.html
>
> Are these screenshots of PgAccess on Mac OSX?
It's pretty sad that "Mike Stonebraker" only has a salary of $15,000. ;-)
I also thought this SIGMOD article was a nice read:
http://www.acm.org/sigmod/record/issue
http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs186/hwk0/index.html
Are these screenshots of PgAccess on Mac OSX?
Robert Treat
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 13:07, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>
> PostgreSQL most definitely works great on Solaris x86 !
>
> At UC Berkeley, we have our undergraduate students hack
PostgreSQL most definitely works great on Solaris x86 !
At UC Berkeley, we have our undergraduate students hack on the
internals of PostgreSQL in the upper-division "Introduction to
Database Systems" class ..
http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs186/
The "official" platform is Solaris x86 - tha
I think they are actually trying to pull it out of the dumpster,
whether from desperation of marketing acumen no one knows. I think
they've gone back to the 'if we can get them hooked on a dual opteron
box, we can sell them some massive E1' or whatever.
On Nov 18, 2003, at 11:32 AM, Chris
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christoper
Smiga) transmitted:
> Does anyone know if there is going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in
> the near future. What is the decission to develop on this platform
> since Sun is pushing Solaris x86 harder than ever.
I
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Christoper Smiga wrote:
> All:
>
> Does anyone know if there is going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
> near future. What is the decission to develop on this platform since Sun
> is pushing Solaris x86 harder than ever.
Doesn't it work? I've run on Solaris 8 x86 extensi
All:
Does anyone know if there is going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
near future. What is the decission to develop on this platform since Sun
is pushing Solaris x86 harder than ever.
--
Christopher Smiga
System Engineer (Sun SCSA)
N2 Broadband Network Operations
Phone: 888-671-1268 (NO
20 matches
Mail list logo
