Amit,
* Amit Langote (amitlangot...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> (Of course, maybe the question we ought to be asking here is why
> >> ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION failed to go with the flow and be a
> >> com
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> (Of course, maybe the question we ought to be asking here is why
>> ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION failed to go with the flow and be a
>> combinable action.)
>
> I did wonder that myself but havne't looked
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> >> I had considered removing those but thought that some users might think
> >> that they're only "altering" one table and therefore felt it made sense
> >> to keep those explicitly listed.
>
> > I agree with Stephen; it's not crys
Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> I had considered removing those but thought that some users might think
>> that they're only "altering" one table and therefore felt it made sense
>> to keep those explicitly listed.
> I agree with Stephen; it's not crystal clear from the user's POV that
> the command is
Stephen Frost wrote:
> Tom,
>
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > BTW, so far as the HEAD version of this patch goes, I notice that
> > ATTACH PARTITION and DETACH PARTITION were recently added to the
> > list of exceptions. But they're not exceptions according to this
> > wording: they
Tom,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost writes:
> > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> So maybe something like
> >>
> >> All the forms of ALTER TABLE that act on a single table,
> >> except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
> >> list of multiple alteratio
Stephen Frost writes:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> So maybe something like
>>
>> All the forms of ALTER TABLE that act on a single table,
>> except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
>> list of multiple alterations to be applied together.
> Committed and back-patch'd th
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> So maybe something like
>
> All the forms of ALTER TABLE that act on a single table,
> except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
> list of multiple alterations to be applied together.
Committed and back-patch'd that way.
Thank
On 2016/12/20 4:08, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/30/16 8:47 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> So maybe something like
>>>
>>> All the forms of ALTER TABLE that act on a single table,
>>> except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
>>> list of multiple alterations to be applied tog
On 11/30/16 8:47 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> So maybe something like
>>
>> All the forms of ALTER TABLE that act on a single table,
>> except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
>> list of multiple alterations to be applied together.
>
> Updated patch attached.
Could you p
On 2016/12/01 1:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost writes:
>> Seems like this would be a bit better:
>
>> --
>> All the actions, when acting on a single table and not using the ALL IN
>> TABLESPACE form, except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
>> list of multiple alterations to
Stephen Frost writes:
> Seems like this would be a bit better:
> --
> All the actions, when acting on a single table and not using the ALL IN
> TABLESPACE form, except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
> list of multiple alterations to be applied.
> --
> I note that we say 'i
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Amit,
>
> * Amit Langote (langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote:
>> Perhaps, it should say something like:
>>
>> All the actions except RENAME, SET TABLESPACE (when using the ALL IN
>> TABLESPACE form) and SET SCHEMA can be combin
Amit,
* Amit Langote (langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote:
> Perhaps, it should say something like:
>
> All the actions except RENAME, SET TABLESPACE (when using the ALL IN
> TABLESPACE form) and SET SCHEMA can be combined into a list of multiple
> alterations to apply in parallel.
Seems like t
The following sentence in the ALTER TABLE documentation is not entirely
accurate:
"All the actions except RENAME, SET TABLESPACE and SET SCHEMA can be
combined into a list of multiple alterations to apply in parallel."
SET TABLESPACE (in the ALTER TABLE form) can be combined with other
sub-comman
The following sentence in the ALTER TABLE documentation is not entirely
accurate:
"All the actions except RENAME, SET TABLESPACE and SET SCHEMA can be
combined into a list of multiple alterations to apply in parallel."
SET TABLESPACE (in the ALTER TABLE form) can be combined with other
subcommand
16 matches
Mail list logo
