Re: [HACKERS] Oddity with psql \d and pg_table_is_visible

2007-09-07 Thread Decibel!
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 03:27:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Decibel! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While this is correct on a per-relation level, I'm thinking that it's not what we'd really like to have happen in psql. What I'd like \d to do is show me everything in any schema that's in my

[HACKERS] Oddity with psql \d and pg_table_is_visible

2007-09-05 Thread Decibel!
I have a database where I'd created a copy of pg_class in public. pgAdmin shows that the table exists, but \d doesn't. This is because of how pg_table_is_visible works, specifically this comment: /* * If it is in the path, it might still not be visible; it could be * hidden by another relation

Re: [HACKERS] Oddity with psql \d and pg_table_is_visible

2007-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Decibel! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While this is correct on a per-relation level, I'm thinking that it's not what we'd really like to have happen in psql. What I'd like \d to do is show me everything in any schema that's in my search_path, even if there's something higher in the search_path