PostgreSQLers,
I just ran into an issue where a client thought that autovacuum was
running but it wasn't. This is because it's not fatal when autovacuum
is on but stats_start_collector and/or stats_row_level is off. I
suspect that there's a reason that it's not fatal, so I thought that
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:07:39PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
PostgreSQLers,
I just ran into an issue where a client thought that autovacuum was
running but it wasn't. This is because it's not fatal when autovacuum
is on but stats_start_collector and/or stats_row_level is off. I
On Sep 28, 2006, at 16:39, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
+1. I was just at a client today that had run into this problem.
Actually, I'm in favor of refusing to start if autovac is on but the
proper stats settings aren't. I'd rather that then people ending up
with
bloated databases and crappy
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:07:39PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
PostgreSQLers,
I just ran into an issue where a client thought that autovacuum was
running but it wasn't. This is because it's not fatal when autovacuum
is on but stats_start_collector and/or stats_row_level
