On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual
places that I monitor.
Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
copy of the message never arrived here
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those
subjects i was missing.
Doesn't do me much good if too
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those
subjects
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
snip
Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's
availability being on the advocacy site?
*We* mentioned it's availability being on the Advocacy site, because it
gives people a single place
Neil Conway wrote:
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
snip
Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's
availability being on the advocacy site?
*We* mentioned it's availability being on the Advocacy site, because it
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Neil Conway wrote:
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
snip
Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's
availability being on the advocacy site?
*We* mentioned it's
There isn't one!
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
There isn't one!
Chris
No kidding. I propose changes to the following pages:
http://www14.us.postgresql.org/: Prominent mention of the latest
stable and unstable releases (just stable now, of course). But since
this seems to be kind of a repeat of the news
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
There isn't one!
Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual
places that I monitor.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Glad you liked it. But that doesn't change the fact that it obscured the
release to the point that many people didn't even know it was released.
I found out by folks complaining about broken links.
Hrm - the subject said it all, plus
- Original Message -
From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
There isn't
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
It has been announced on the announce mailing list and in the eweek
article... It's downloadable from the advocacy site...
Yeah, that'll let the world know.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of
On 29 Nov 2002, Ryan Mahoney wrote:
Scroll down and read the rest of, it's an excellent announcement! If
the website and mirrors made mention of the release (as of 8:19PM CST
they don't!) and the message was sent to all the mailing lists, there
would probably be less confusion. When I read
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual
places that I monitor.
Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general
though).
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the
usual
places that I monitor.
Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual
places that I monitor.
Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
copy of the message never arrived here
Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general
though). Evidently you and Vince never got it either ...
After alot of searching I did find it. It wasn't exactly what one would
expect a
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that
copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general
though). Evidently you and Vince never got it either ...
After alot of searching I did
Glad you liked it. But that doesn't change the fact that it obscured the
release to the point that many people didn't even know it was released.
I found out by folks complaining about broken links.
Hrm - the subject said it all, plus what about the first 2 paragraphs?
PostgreSQL Global
FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those
subjects i was missing.
---
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002,
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those
subjects i was missing.
Doesn't do me much good if too often I don't have the luxury of a large
screen 'cuze
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those
subjects i was missing.
Doesn't do me much good if too often I don't have the
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120
column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those
subjects i was missing.
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
snip
Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's
availability being on the advocacy site?
*We* mentioned it's availability being on the Advocacy site, because it
gives people a single place to go that has both PostgreSQL itself *and*
a site
24 matches
Mail list logo
