On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 19:00, Bruce Momjian wrote:
It is an idea if no better one can be found, unless we don't want ALTER
DOMAIN at all, which doesn't seem good.
I'll make a proposal for 'Object' locks as suggested, and we'll see
where we go from there.
--
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 00:05, Tom Lane wrote:
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 22:56, Tom Lane wrote:
relation's pg_class row. We have no such locks on types at present,
but I think it may be time to invent 'em.
I'd be happy to use them once created.
I think
Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 00:05, Tom Lane wrote:
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 22:56, Tom Lane wrote:
relation's pg_class row. We have no such locks on types at present,
but I think it may be time to invent
I've been looking at the recently-committed ALTER DOMAIN patch, and I
think it's got some serious if not fatal problems. Specifically, the
approach to adding/dropping constraints associated with domains doesn't
work.
1. Insufficient locking, guise 1: there's no protection against someone
else
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 12:39, Tom Lane wrote:
I've been looking at the recently-committed ALTER DOMAIN patch, and I
think it's got some serious if not fatal problems. Specifically, the
approach to adding/dropping constraints associated with domains doesn't
work.
1. Insufficient locking,
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Insufficient locking, guise 2: there's no protection against someone
else adding a column or table while you're processing an ALTER DOMAIN,
either. This means that constraint checks will be missed. Example:
Locking the entry in pg_type doesn't prevent
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 22:56, Tom Lane wrote:
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Insufficient locking, guise 2: there's no protection against someone
else adding a column or table while you're processing an ALTER DOMAIN,
either. This means that constraint checks will be missed.
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 22:56, Tom Lane wrote:
relation's pg_class row. We have no such locks on types at present,
but I think it may be time to invent 'em.
I'd be happy to use them once created.
I think you misunderstood me ;=) ... that was a
Rod Taylor wrote:
relation's pg_class row. We have no such locks on types at present,
but I think it may be time to invent 'em.
I'd be happy to use them once created.
Thanks again for the help.
Where does that leave the patch _until_ they are created?
--
Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where does that leave the patch _until_ they are created?
I'd say it's under death sentence unless fixed before 7.4 release.
I don't want to back it out in toto right now, because that will
interfere with other edits I'm in process of making (and also Rod
10 matches
Mail list logo
