On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:27:05PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I haven't seen a specific number, it might depend on exactly which cipher is
negotiated. See for example http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/
Re: Bruce Momjian 2015-04-01 20150401160907.gj4...@momjian.us
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:27:05PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I haven't seen a specific number, it might depend on exactly which cipher is
negotiated. See for example http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
Googling for digest too big for rsa key seems to indicate that this
problem occurs when you are using
Re: Chris Butler 2014-12-19
1155204201.65430.1418975376728.javamail.zim...@zedcore.com
One of our servers is currently running on postgres 9.2 using the
9.2.9-1.pgdg70+1 packages from pgdg.
After an apt update this morning which brought in the libpq5 package version
9.4.0-1.pgdg70+1,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
Re: Chris Butler 2014-12-19
1155204201.65430.1418975376728.javamail.zim...@zedcore.com
One of our servers is currently running on postgres 9.2 using the
9.2.9-1.pgdg70+1 packages from pgdg.
After an apt update this
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
Googling for digest too big for rsa key seems to indicate that this
problem occurs when you are using (client?) certificates with short
RSA keys. 512 bits is most often cited in
Hi Christoph,
- Original Message -
From: Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de
To: Chris Butler cbut...@zedcore.com
Googling for digest too big for rsa key seems to indicate that this
problem occurs when you are using (client?) certificates with short
RSA keys. 512 bits is most often cited
