On 4/4/17 12:55, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> As I am not seeing any response from Tomas for last 2-3 days and since
> the commit-fest is coming towards end, I have planned to work on the
> review comments that I had given few days back and submit the updated
> patch. PFA new version of patch that take
On 4/4/17 12:55 PM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
>
> As I am not seeing any response from Tomas for last 2-3 days and since
> the commit-fest is coming towards end, I have planned to work on the
> review comments that I had given few days back and submit the updated
> patch. PFA new version of patch tha
Thanks. I planned to look into this today, but you've been faster ;-)
regards
Tomas
On 04/04/2017 06:55 PM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
Hi,
As I am not seeing any response from Tomas for last 2-3 days and since
the commit-fest is coming towards end, I have planned to work on the
review comments tha
Hi,
As I am not seeing any response from Tomas for last 2-3 days and since
the commit-fest is coming towards end, I have planned to work on the
review comments that I had given few days back and submit the updated
patch. PFA new version of patch that takes care of all the review
comments given by
On 4/4/17 9:43 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, David Steele wrote:
>> My goal is to help people focus on patches that have a chance. At this
>> point I think that includes poking authors who are not being responsive
>> using the limited means at my disposal.
>
> +1. Pin
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, David Steele wrote:
> My goal is to help people focus on patches that have a chance. At this
> point I think that includes poking authors who are not being responsive
> using the limited means at my disposal.
+1. Pings on specific threads can help clear things up
On 4/4/17 9:11 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 4 April 2017 at 09:05, David Steele wrote:
>> Hi Tomas,
>>
>> On 4/1/17 5:40 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
>>>
>>> Apart from above comments, your patch looks good to me. I have also
>>> marked this patch as 'Waiting for Author' in the commitfest. Thanks.
>>
On 4 April 2017 at 09:05, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> On 4/1/17 5:40 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
>>
>> Apart from above comments, your patch looks good to me. I have also
>> marked this patch as 'Waiting for Author' in the commitfest. Thanks.
>
> The CF has been extended until April 7 but t
Hi Tomas,
On 4/1/17 5:40 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
>
> Apart from above comments, your patch looks good to me. I have also
> marked this patch as 'Waiting for Author' in the commitfest. Thanks.
The CF has been extended until April 7 but time is still growing short
and this thread has been idle
On 3/29/17 11:08 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The attached patch is the best I came up with - it essentially shares
just the tuple-forming part, which is exactly the same in both cases.
I have marked this submission "Needs Review".
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
On 3/23/17 11:27 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 3/17/17 18:35, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 03/17/2017 05:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I'm struggling to find a good way to share code between
bt_page_items(text, int4) and bt_page_items(bytea).
If we do it via the SQL route, as I had suggested, it m
11 matches
Mail list logo