Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bruce wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Currently, config.sgml still describes the new enum GUC variables
as being of type string --- but pg_settings says they are enum.
This is not very consistent, but I wonder whether changing the docs
would be
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Last I checked, Magnus had promised to come up with suitable
documentation changes for this patch, but then he went off sailing...
Meh, I seem to have forgotten this one again. Here's a suggestion, seems
ok, or were you thinking about
Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Last I checked, Magnus had promised to come up with suitable
documentation changes for this patch, but then he went off sailing...
Meh, I seem to have forgotten this one again. Here's a suggestion, seems
ok, or were
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bruce wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Currently, config.sgml still describes the new enum GUC variables
as being of type string --- but pg_settings says they are enum.
This is not very consistent, but I wonder whether changing the docs
would be
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bruce wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Currently, config.sgml still describes the new enum GUC variables
as being of type string --- but pg_settings says they are enum.
This is not very consistent, but I wonder whether changing the docs
would be more confusing
Tom Lane wrote:
Currently, config.sgml still describes the new enum GUC variables
as being of type string --- but pg_settings says they are enum.
This is not very consistent, but I wonder whether changing the docs
would be more confusing or less so. I note that section 18.1 doesn't
mention
bruce wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Currently, config.sgml still describes the new enum GUC variables
as being of type string --- but pg_settings says they are enum.
This is not very consistent, but I wonder whether changing the docs
would be more confusing or less so. I note that section 18.1
Tom Lane wrote:
Currently, config.sgml still describes the new enum GUC variables
as being of type string --- but pg_settings says they are enum.
This is not very consistent, but I wonder whether changing the docs
would be more confusing or less so. I note that section 18.1 doesn't
mention
Currently, config.sgml still describes the new enum GUC variables
as being of type string --- but pg_settings says they are enum.
This is not very consistent, but I wonder whether changing the docs
would be more confusing or less so. I note that section 18.1 doesn't
mention the enum alternative
