On 2015-05-14 23:28:33 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
I've removed the use of GroupedVars and Andrew is right now working on
structural changes. I'm not ready at this point to make a judgement.
Andrew worked really hard and addressed the voiced concerns with the way
chaining was done. In my last
On 05/15/2015 12:32 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Note that I am not proposing a general delay in feature freeze. I am
specifically proposing an additional week for Grouping Sets and *only*
for Grouping Sets.
Core is in charge of releases. I believe like the other semi and formal
organizations
On 5/13/15 7:46 PM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
* ctidscan as an example of custom-scan
This basically hasn't gotten any attention, which may mean nobody cares
enough to justify putting it in the tree. We need to either push it to
next CF or reject altogether.
Agreed. I was fine with never
On 5/14/15 5:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
True, but I have problems with leaders acting in a way that is unfair to
those with less power. Have you considered how demoralizing it is to
work in an unfair environment? Unfairness happens, but as leaders, we
are supposed to try to avoid it, not cause it.
On 2015-05-13 11:38:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Looking at what remains open in the current commitfest:
As of now the remaining items !bugfix entries are:
* GIN fillfactor
I'd like to put this one on Heikki's plate as well, since he's touched
the GIN code more than anyone else lately.
While
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-13 11:38:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
* GIN fillfactor
I'd like to put this one on Heikki's plate as well, since he's touched
the GIN code more than anyone else lately.
While sad, I think this is going to have to be moved.
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
I think we can close the commitfest now? Moving these three entries to
the next one?
Yeah, I don't think any of the remaining entries are committable.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 05/14/2015 03:58 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:57:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
is rejected to due to time. I
On 2015-05-15 18:00:49 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-14 23:28:33 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
I've removed the use of GroupedVars and Andrew is right now working on
structural changes. I'm not ready at this point to make a judgement.
Andrew worked really hard and addressed the
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:10:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 05/13/2015 11:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
* Grouping Sets
I had originally promised to be committer for this one, and still want
to go look at it, but Robert's nearby message about not
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
is rejected to due to time. I might lose the vote, but I am going to
try because if we lose our reputation for fairness, we have lost a
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:28:33PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced
of that yet, but time grows short, and
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:28:33PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Life is unfair.
True, but I have problems with leaders acting in a way that is unfair to
those with less power. Have you considered how demoralizing it is to
work in an unfair environment? Unfairness happens, but as
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:57:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
is rejected to due to time. I might lose the vote, but I am going to
try
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 05/13/2015 11:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
* Grouping Sets
I had originally promised to be committer for this one, and still want
to go look at it, but Robert's nearby message about not committing stuff
in haste definitely seems to apply.
That makes
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:10:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The good news on this front is that Salesforce has recently taken an
interest in having GROUPING SETS capability, so I should be able to
find more time to work on this over the next month or two.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced
of that yet, but time grows
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:37:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:10:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The good news on this front is that Salesforce has recently taken an
interest in having GROUPING SETS capability, so I should be able to
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:37:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
[ shrug... ] Andrew had unilaterally removed me as committer from that
patch back in January or so, so it dropped way down my priority list.
I'm willing to move it back up now, but I could do
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced
of that yet, but time grows short, and I quite agree with Robert that
committing almost-ready patches at
On 15/05/15 10:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:57:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
is rejected to due to time. I might
Looking at what remains open in the current commitfest:
* fsync $PGDATA recursively at startup
Andres is the reviewer of record on this one. He should either commit it
if he feels it's ready, or bounce it to next CF if not.
* EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns
Tom, all,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
* Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
I concur with Stephen's assessment that this doesn't look well designed.
I think we should just mark it RWF for now.
I had meant to do that already, sorry about that, done now.
*
On 05/13/2015 11:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
* Grouping Sets
I had originally promised to be committer for this one, and still want
to go look at it, but Robert's nearby message about not committing stuff
in haste definitely seems to apply.
That makes me sad. I wish you would still try.
Sadly,
I wrote:
* Cube extension kNN support
This is still marked as needs review, I'm afraid we have to push to 9.6.
* compress method for spgist
Sigh. There was a Ditto under this one, but somehow it disappeared
in editing :-(
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
* Additional role attributes
Is this ready to commit? Stephen's call.
-1 for committing this, per discussion earlier today on a thread
that's probably not linked into the
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-13 11:38:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
* Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory
This one's mine of course. I've been hoping to get more independent
performance testing than it's gotten, but time grows short. I'm
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
* fsync $PGDATA recursively at startup
Andres is the reviewer of record on this one. He should either commit it
if he feels it's ready, or bounce it to next CF if not.
I committed the first part of this as
On 13/05/15 17:38, Tom Lane wrote:
* Sequence Access Method
Heikki's marked as reviewer, so it's his call as to whether this is ready,
but the impression I have is that there's not really consensus as to
whether the API is good. If not, it's something I think we should push
to 9.6.
Heikki
* ctidscan as an example of custom-scan
This basically hasn't gotten any attention, which may mean nobody cares
enough to justify putting it in the tree. We need to either push it to
next CF or reject altogether.
Agreed. I was fine with never committing this. I don't think we have
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-13 11:38:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
* parallel mode/contexts
Robert's patch, his to deal with (likewise for assessing parallel-safety).
Just as a note, a large part of this has been committed.
Right, and Robert commented that he isn't
On 2015-05-13 11:38:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
* parallel mode/contexts
Robert's patch, his to deal with (likewise for assessing parallel-safety).
Just as a note, a large part of this has been committed.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-13 11:38:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
* parallel mode/contexts
Robert's patch, his to deal with (likewise for assessing parallel-safety).
Just as a note, a large part of this
On 2015-05-13 11:38:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Looking at what remains open in the current commitfest:
* fsync $PGDATA recursively at startup
Andres is the reviewer of record on this one. He should either commit it
if he feels it's ready, or bounce it to next CF if not.
The more important
36 matches
Mail list logo
