mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
*) also, isn't it possible to change text cast influencing GUCs 'n'
times per statement considering any
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Chris Browne cbbro...@acm.org wrote:
mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
*) also, isn't it possible to
Chris Browne cbbro...@acm.org writes:
mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
yeah -- perhaps you shouldn't be allowed set things like datestyle in
functions then.
That would cause grief for Slony-I, methinks, and probably other things
that behave somewhat similar.
Yeah, it's not really
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Chris Browne cbbro...@acm.org wrote:
mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
*) also, isn't it possible to
mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Chris Browne cbbro...@acm.org wrote:
mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure
While chatting with Haas off-list regarding how the new array/string
functions should work (see the thread in its glory here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg148865.html)
the debate morphed into the relative pros and cons about the proposed
concat() being marked stable
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
While chatting with Haas off-list regarding how the new array/string
functions should work (see the thread in its glory here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg148865.html)
the debate morphed into the relative pros and cons
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
While chatting with Haas off-list regarding how the new array/string
functions should work (see the thread in its glory here:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
*) also, isn't it possible to change text cast influencing GUCs 'n'
times per statement considering any query can call a function and any
function can say, change datestyle? Shouldn't the related functions
be marked
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
*) also, isn't it possible to change text cast influencing GUCs 'n'
times per statement considering any query can call a function and any
function
10 matches
Mail list logo