Ashutosh Bapat writes:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think you'd just end up putting it back at some point. It's the only
>> means that foreign_expr_walker() has for getting at the root pointer,
>> and nearly all planner code needs that. Seems to me it's just chance
>>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ashutosh Bapat writes:
>> The member root in foreign_glob_cxt isn't used anywhere by
>> postgres_fdw code. Without that member the code compiles and
>> regression passes. The member was added by d0d75c40. I looked at that
>> commit briefly but di
Ashutosh Bapat writes:
> The member root in foreign_glob_cxt isn't used anywhere by
> postgres_fdw code. Without that member the code compiles and
> regression passes. The member was added by d0d75c40. I looked at that
> commit briefly but did not find any code using it there. So, possibly
> it's
Hi,
The member root in foreign_glob_cxt isn't used anywhere by
postgres_fdw code. Without that member the code compiles and
regression passes. The member was added by d0d75c40. I looked at that
commit briefly but did not find any code using it there. So, possibly
it's unused since it was introduced
