On 2014-04-18 11:50:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
It's this (older) assertion in HeapTupleHeaderGetCmax():
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-04-17 17:40:01 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
For once, this looks more like a problem in logical decoding, which is
trying to assert about the tuple being updated; the assertion failing is
the one added a week
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2014-04-17 17:40:01 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
For once, this looks more like a problem in logical decoding, which is
trying to assert about the tuple being updated; the assertion failing
On 2014-04-18 16:44:55 +0200, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2014-04-17 17:40:01 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
For once, this looks more like a problem in logical decoding, which is
trying to assert about the tuple being
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-04-18 11:50:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
It's a bit painful that HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid allocates memory,
but to fix that we would have to remove all allocations from
GetMultiXactIdMembers which doesn't sound feasible.
I was thinking for a second we
On 2014-04-18 11:50:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
It's a bit painful that HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid allocates memory,
but to fix that we would have to remove all allocations from
GetMultiXactIdMembers which doesn't sound feasible.
I was thinking for a second we could just allocate
With master/9.4 from today (52e757420fa98a76015c2c88432db94269f3e8f4)
I am getting an assertion when doing a truncate via SPI when I have
wal_level=logical.
Stack trace is below.
I am just replicating a table with normal slony (2.2) I don't need to
establish any replication slots to get
Hi,
On 2014-04-17 16:23:54 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
With master/9.4 from today (52e757420fa98a76015c2c88432db94269f3e8f4)
I am getting an assertion when doing a truncate via SPI when I have
wal_level=logical.
Stack trace is below.
I am just replicating a table with normal slony (2.2)
Steve Singer wrote:
With master/9.4 from today (52e757420fa98a76015c2c88432db94269f3e8f4)
I am getting an assertion when doing a truncate via SPI when I have
wal_level=logical.
Stack trace is below.
I am just replicating a table with normal slony (2.2) I don't need
to establish any
On 2014-04-17 17:40:01 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
For once, this looks more like a problem in logical decoding, which is
trying to assert about the tuple being updated; the assertion failing is
the one added a week ago about not palloc'ing in a critical section.
It's this (older) assertion
On 04/17/2014 04:33 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-04-17 16:23:54 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
With master/9.4 from today (52e757420fa98a76015c2c88432db94269f3e8f4)
I am getting an assertion when doing a truncate via SPI when I have
wal_level=logical.
Stack trace is below.
I am just
11 matches
Mail list logo
