Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-12-05 Thread Jim Nasby
On 12/5/16 3:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: Moved to next CF with needs review. 1. patch doesn't receive any full review in the commitfest 2. Patch received feedback at the end of commitfest. The number of patches that got this treatment seems

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-12-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > Moved to next CF with needs review. > 1. patch doesn't receive any full review in the commitfest > 2. Patch received feedback at the end of commitfest. The number of patches that got this treatment seems quite large. If the people who are

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-12-05 Thread Haribabu Kommi
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Amit Kapila (amit.kapil...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Michael Paquier > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Haribabu Kommi < > kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I definitely may missed judging

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-12-05 Thread Stephen Frost
* Amit Kapila (amit.kapil...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Haribabu Kommi > > wrote: > >> I definitely may missed judging the current state of the patch. Please feel > >> free to update the actual status. > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-12-05 Thread Amit Kapila
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Haribabu Kommi > wrote: >> I definitely may missed judging the current state of the patch. Please feel >> free to update the actual status. > > That's definitely up to the authors and reviewers to double-ch

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-12-04 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > Micheal, I need your help in closing the commitfest. And done. Thanks for doing this work! I was ready to use my CF vacuum cleaner as need be, but that does not seem to be needed. > I closed the commitfest using the following assumptions.

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-12-04 Thread Haribabu Kommi
Hi All, The commitfest status summary at the end of commitfest. Needs review: 0 Waiting on author: 0 Ready for Commiter: 0 Commited: 41 Moved to next CF: 79 Rejected: 7 Returned with feedback: 20 TOTAL: 147 Overall progress of completion - 46% (doesn't include "moved to next CF") Micheal, I n

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-29 Thread Haribabu Kommi
Hi All, The commitfest status summary after four weeks of progress: Needs review: 48 Waiting on author: 25 Ready for Commiter: 12 Commited: 36 Moved to next CF: 15 Rejected: 5 Returned with feedback: 6 TOTAL: 147 Overall progress of completion - 42% week-1 progress of completion - 9% week-2 pr

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-22 Thread Haribabu Kommi
Hi All, The commitfest status summary after three weeks of progress: Needs review: 59 Waiting on author: 28 Ready for Commiter: 16 Commited: 35 Moved to next CF: 0 Rejected: 5 Returned with feedback: 4 TOTAL: 147 Overall progress of completion - 29% week-1 progress of completion - 9% week-2 pr

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-16 Thread Haribabu Kommi
Hi All, The commitfest status summary after one week of progress: Needs review: 76 Waiting on author: 16 Ready for Commiter: 16 Commited: 32 Moved to next CF: 0 Rejected: 4 Returned with feedback: 3 TOTAL: 147 Overall progress of completion - 26%. week-1 progress of completion - 9%. week-2 pro

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-08 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > Well, then it should be marked "Waiting on Author" or "Needs Review", > not "Ready for Committer". > > Or maybe just "Returned with Feedback", if the reporter hasn't poked > his head up for a few weeks. Since yesterday with the help of Tsunaka

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Haribabu Kommi >> wrote: >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/11/604/ - pgwin32_is_service not >> checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled > > This

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-08 Thread Haribabu Kommi
Hi All, The commitfest status summary after one week of progress: Needs review: 78 Waiting on author: 16 Ready for Commiter: 19 Commited: 28 Moved to next CF: 0 Rejected: 3 Returned with feedback: 3 TOTAL: 147 Overall progress of completion - 23%. week-1 progress of completion - 9%. There ar

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-06 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Haribabu Kommi > wrote: > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/11/604/ - pgwin32_is_service not > checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled This is quite a particular fix in a particular context. This is as we

Re: [HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-03 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > There are plenty of patches that are in "ready for committer" state, > committers please have a look at those patches and give some conclusion > on them. Yes, we really need some more committer attention on a lot of these patches. I've been

[HACKERS] commitfest 2016-11 status summary

2016-11-01 Thread Haribabu Kommi
Hi All, The 2016-11 commitfest is officially started. Please add any further development patches into 2017-01 commitfest. The current status summary is: Needs review: 98 Waiting on author: 9 Ready for Commiter: 18 Commited: 19 Moved to next CF: 0 Rejected: 0 Returned with feedback: 3 TOTAL: 147