On 2016-04-12 13:57:26 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I have booked two large NUMA machines for Friday to look for any
> remaining performance regressions on high-concurrency loads on such
> machines. Anyone with ideas on particular tests that they feel
> should be included, please let me know bef
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Alexander Korotkov
>> So, for read-only benchmark this patch introduces more than 5 times
>> regression on big machine.
>
> I did not schedule a saturation test on a big machine. I guess I
> should have do
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> 1) We uglify buffer manager interface a lot. This patch adds 3 more
> arguments to BufferGetPage(). It looks weird. Should we try to find less
> invasive way for doing this?
As already pointed out, I originally touched about 450 few
