Re: [HACKERS] small pg_basebackup display bug

2013-01-17 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote: >>> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated >>> display is not >>> particular useful. > >> Agreed - it's useful during testing, b

Re: [HACKERS] small pg_basebackup display bug

2012-12-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 01:20:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote: > >> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated > >> display is not > >> particular useful. > > > Agreed - it's useful dur

Re: [HACKERS] small pg_basebackup display bug

2012-12-16 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated >> display is not >> particular useful. > Agreed - it's useful during testing, but not in a typical production > use. It might actually be

Re: [HACKERS] small pg_basebackup display bug

2012-12-16 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote: > On Sat, December 15, 2012 14:10, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote: >>> from 9.3devel (this morning): >> >> >>> The truncated name in parentheses only shows up during the filling of the >>> new PG

Re: [HACKERS] small pg_basebackup display bug

2012-12-15 Thread Erik Rijkers
On Sat, December 15, 2012 14:10, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> from 9.3devel (this morning): > > >> The truncated name in parentheses only shows up during the filling of the >> new PGDATA; when 100% >> is >> reached that part of the displayed na

Re: [HACKERS] small pg_basebackup display bug

2012-12-15 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote: > from 9.3devel (this morning): Is this different from 9.2 and earlier? > There is a small bug in pg_basebackup: it displays a truncated part of what > seems to be the new > $PGDATA (the source code has 'filename' there, but I don't see wha

[HACKERS] small pg_basebackup display bug

2012-12-15 Thread Erik Rijkers
from 9.3devel (this morning): There is a small bug in pg_basebackup: it displays a truncated part of what seems to be the new $PGDATA (the source code has 'filename' there, but I don't see what's supposed to be in there). The truncated name in parentheses only shows up during the filling of the