On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 04:10:13PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:04:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > All that probably needed to change for cygwin was to no longer
> > > use sa_family_t in the getaddrinfo.c.
> >
> > But Jason repo
Bruce,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:04:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > All that probably needed to change for cygwin was to no longer
> > use sa_family_t in the getaddrinfo.c.
>
> But Jason reported he needed that typedef for sa_family_t. Jason, is
> that accurate.
Yes.
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:49:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I have applied a patch to CVS to fix the problem. It is all your patch,
> > except for the part you got from me, which was wrong. :-(
> >
> > It took me a while to realize the subtlety of your patch. Fi
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:49:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I have applied a patch to CVS to fix the problem. It is all your patch,
> except for the part you got from me, which was wrong. :-(
>
> It took me a while to realize the subtlety of your patch. First, it
> removes the use of sa
Bruce,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:49:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This should fix most platforms. I am not sure how cygwin is going to
> handle this --- we might have to add a specific sa_family_t typedef
> for that platform --- MinGW does have sa_family_t, but probably
> doesn't need it an
I have applied a patch to CVS to fix the problem. It is all your patch,
except for the part you got from me, which was wrong. :-(
It took me a while to realize the subtlety of your patch. First, it
removes the use of sa_family_t _except_ for cases that don't have
SOCKADDR_STORAGE, where it is
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 18:56:30 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 23:01:19 +0200,
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:01:27PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > >
> > > My system does have its own sockaddr_storage de
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 23:01:19 +0200,
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:01:27PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > My system does have its own sockaddr_storage definition. I think
> > it uses __ss_ as the prefix. Also, after looking at the fallback
> > defi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:01:27PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> My system does have its own sockaddr_storage definition. I think
> it uses __ss_ as the prefix. Also, after looking at the fallback
> definition in pqcomm.h, I don't see where that defines ss_family
> and hence don't see how that
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 23:01:27 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am going to see if adding __ works as suggested by someone else
> who replied.
This worked. I think the reason auth.c compiled was because the reference
to ss_family was in conditional code that isn't used on
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 22:49:00 +0200,
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:32:32PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I was looking at this some more and now think there is something wrong
> > with the references to ss_family rather than a missing inlcude file.
> >
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 22:49:00 +0200,
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:32:32PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I was looking at this some more and now think there is something wrong
> > with the references to ss_family rather than a missing inlcude file.
> >
My system has the same problem - struct sockaddr_storage is defined in
/usr/include/bits/socket.h :
struct sockaddr_storage
{
__SOCKADDR_COMMON (__ss_); /* Address family, etc. */
__ss_aligntype __ss_align; /* Force desired alignment. */
char __ss_padding[_SS_PADSIZE];
};
Whe
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:32:32PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I was looking at this some more and now think there is something wrong
> with the references to ss_family rather than a missing inlcude file.
> Perhaps those were supposed to be references to sa_family or there
> is a missing field
I was looking at this some more and now think there is something wrong
with the references to ss_family rather than a missing inlcude file.
Perhaps those were supposed to be references to sa_family or there
is a missing field from the socket_storage type definition.
---(end
15 matches
Mail list logo
