Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: >> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 24 17:18:21 -0400 2010: >>> Well, I might be missing something here, but pg_class already IS >>> database-specific.  If you change anything very significant about a >>

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 24 17:18:21 -0400 2010: >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> wrote: >> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38 -0400 2010: > >> > Uh, how does this work w

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 24 17:18:21 -0400 2010: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: > > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38 -0400 2010: > > Uh, how does this work when you change the entries for shared relations > > in a databa

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38 -0400 2010: > >> Actually, there's another way we could do this.   Instead of creating >> pg_shared_class and pg_shared_attribute and moving all of the catalog >> entries for the sha

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38 -0400 2010: > Actually, there's another way we could do this. Instead of creating > pg_shared_class and pg_shared_attribute and moving all of the catalog > entries for the shared relations into those tables, we could consider > leaving t

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2010/5/21 Robert Haas : >> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Robert Haas >> wrote (in reply to Tom Lane): >>> If we create, e.g. pg_shared_class and >>> pg_shared_attribute, then we can un-nail the catalogs you just nailed >>> to make the au

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
2010/5/21 Robert Haas : > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Robert Haas > wrote (in reply to Tom Lane): >> If we create, e.g. pg_shared_class and >> pg_shared_attribute, then we can un-nail the catalogs you just nailed >> to make the authentication process able to work without selecting a >> databa

[HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote (in reply to Tom Lane): > If we create, e.g. pg_shared_class and > pg_shared_attribute, then we can un-nail the catalogs you just nailed > to make the authentication process able to work without selecting a > database. Actually, there's another w