Re: [HACKERS] xpath improvement V2

Arie Bikker wrote: Hi all, I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and others. This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it the right way (hope you agree!). Hi, I see the patch has been marked as Returned with Feedback on the 6th of

Re: [HACKERS] xpath improvement V2

Jan Urbański wrote: Arie Bikker wrote: Hi all, I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and others. This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it the right way (hope you agree!). Hi, I see the patch has been marked as Returned with

[HACKERS] xpath improvement V2

Hi all, I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and others. This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it the right way (hope you agree!). BTW. really appreciate your efforts, so far, to enlighten me on nuub errors/mistakes in the previous

Re: [HACKERS] xpath improvement V2

And here is the patch. *** doc/src/sgml/func.sgml.org Tue Feb 2 12:53:59 2010 --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml Fri Feb 12 21:49:01 2010 *** *** 1,4 ! !-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml,v 1.482.2.2 2009/11/24 19:21:04 petere Exp $ -- chapter id=functions

Re: [HACKERS] xpath improvement V2 with xml.c

And a patch for the code implementing this *** doc/src/sgml/func.sgml.org Tue Feb 2 12:53:59 2010 --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml Fri Feb 12 21:49:01 2010 *** *** 1,4 ! !-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml,v 1.482.2.2 2009/11/24 19:21:04 petere Exp $ -- chapter