Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we could do without the Moby Dick extract too ...
I am open to
Sorry, please disregard. Was means for a Japanese FAQ update.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Jeremy Drake wrote:
On
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
I suggest that instead of testing the server-side lo_import/lo_export
functions, perhaps you could test the psql equivalents and write and
read a file in psql's working directory.
snip
In the mean time, I will
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just tried using the \lo_import command in a regression test, and I
think I figured out why this will not work:
...
Yes, that's the large object OID in the output there, and it is different
each run (as I
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we could do without the Moby Dick extract too ...
I am open to suggestions. I saw one suggestion that I use an image of an
elephant, but I suspect that was tongue-in-cheek. I am not very fond of
the
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just tried using the \lo_import command in a regression test, and I
think I figured out why this will not work:
...
Yes, that's the large object OID in the output there, and it is different
each run (as I expect).
Right. I'd suggest temporarily
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I put together a patch which adds a regression test for large objects,
hopefully attached to this message. I would like some critique of it, to
see if I have gone about it the right way. Also I would be happy to
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
I suggest that instead of testing the server-side lo_import/lo_export
functions, perhaps you could test the psql equivalents and write and
read a file in psql's working directory.
I did not see any precedent
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I put together a patch which adds a regression test for large objects,
hopefully attached to this message. I would like some critique of it, to
see if I have gone about it the right way. Also I would be happy to hear
any additional tests which should be
