>
> Yes, I believe so. Isn't that what "To that end, we have established this Code
> of Conduct for community interaction and participation in the project’s
> work and the community at large." basically says?
>
No? What's the "community at large"? To me that sounds like "all
interactions" whether
> To many of us, we absolutely are a community. Remember, there are people
> here who have been around for 20+ years, of which many have become close
> friends, having started working on PostgreSQL as a hobby. We have always
> seen the project as a community of like-minded technologists, and
Yes. They can. The people who make the majority of the contributions to the
> software can decide what happens, because without them there is no
> software. If you want to spend 20 years of your life
>
So everyone who moderates this group and that will be part of the CoC
committee will have had
> Community is people who joined it
We're not a "community." We're people using email to get help with or
discuss technical aspects of PostgreSQL. The types of discussions that
would normally be held within a "community" would be entirely off-topic
here. We should be professional to each other
I didn't realize they had replied personally to me.
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Keener
Date: Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
To: Dave Page
If that business is publicly bringing the project into disrepute, or
> harassing other commun
>
> And if you believe strongly that a given statement you may have made is
> not objectionable...you should be willing to defend it in an adjudication
> investigation.
So because someone doesn't like what I say in a venue 100% separate from
postgres, I have to subject myself, and waste my
I understand the concern, however, if you look at how attacks happen
> it is frequently through other sites. Specifically under/poorly
> moderated sites. For specific examples, people who have issues with
> people on Quora will frequently go after them on Facebook and Twitter.
>
> these aren't a
> Now, you may say that (2) would be rejected by the committee, but I would
>> counter that it's still a stain on me and something that will forever
>> appear
>> along side my name in search results and that the amount of time and
>> stress it'd take me to defend myself would make my voluntarily
I find a lot of neo-con/trumpian political stances moronic, short-sighted, and
anti-intellectual and therefore consider them offensive, an affront on my way
of life, and a stain on my country.
1) Can I report anyone holding such views and discussing them on a 3rd party
forum?
2) Could I be
>
> You may dislike the outcome, but it was not ignored.
I can accept that I don't like the outcome, but I can point to maybe a
dozen people in the last
exchange worried about the CoC being used to further political goals, and
the only response
was "well, the CoC Committee will handle it
> following a long consultation process
It's not a consultation if any dissenting voice is simply ignored. Don't
sugar-coat or politicize it like this -- it was rammed down everyone's throats.
That is core's right, but don't act as everyone's opinions and concerns were
taken into
11 matches
Mail list logo
