Re: [PATCH] ECPG bug fix in preproc when indicator struct is shorter than record struct

> Do you want patches for the back ports as well? > I noticed that between 9.6 (which is what we're using with this > customer) and 10 the variable arrsiz was renamed to arrsize, so > slight differences. Did not check earlier releases yet. Na, don't worry, git cherry-pick and conflict resolution

Re: [PATCH] ECPG bug fix in preproc when indicator struct is shorter than record struct

Thank you! On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Attached is a proposed patch to fix a bug in the ECPG preprocessor > > that generates application code that core dumps at run-time. When the > > input pgc code uses a record struct for returning query

Re: [PATCH] ECPG bug fix in preproc when indicator struct is shorter than record struct

> Attached is a proposed patch to fix a bug in the ECPG preprocessor > that generates application code that core dumps at run-time. When the > input pgc code uses a record struct for returning query results and > uses an indicator struct that has fewer fields than the record > struct, the

[PATCH] ECPG bug fix in preproc when indicator struct is shorter than record struct

Hello - Attached is a proposed patch to fix a bug in the ECPG preprocessor that generates application code that core dumps at run-time. When the input pgc code uses a record struct for returning query results and uses an indicator struct that has fewer fields than the record struct, the generated