On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 07:17:24PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Pushed 0003.
Thanks.
> Maybe we can get rid of format_type_be_qualified too, but I didn't
> care too much about it either; it's not a big deal I think.
Agreed. There are 16 callers spread in objectaddress.c and regproc.c,
this wo
Michael Paquier wrote:
> > As far as format_type_extended() is concerned, IMO we've gone far enough
> > with the number of variants of format_type(). Making the function
> > public makes sense to me, but let's add a bits32 flags argument instead
> > of exposing the messy set of booleans. We can
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:01:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Thanks Mr. Robot and Thomas for the reminder. Attached is an updated
> > patch set taking care of those warnings, 0002 and 0004 being impacted.
>
> The last patch set has rotten enough for git am to compl
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> Attached is a rebased patch set. Álvaro, as you have introduced most
>> of the problems with 4464303 & friends dated of 2015 when you
>> introduced get_object_address(), could yo
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Attached is a rebased patch set. Álvaro, as you have introduced most
> of the problems with 4464303 & friends dated of 2015 when you
> introduced get_object_address(), could you look at this patch set?
Moved to next commit fest.
--
Michae
