On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:13:09PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> I think that we should consider this as committed.
It should, so done now.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 07:37:02AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/1/21 8:29 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the
> > > documentation. The final outcome is that it can be
On 3/1/21 8:29 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the
documentation. The final outcome is that it can be difficult to
monitor the archiver state in such case. That's orthogonal to
Thanks !
Le mar. 2 mars 2021 à 04:10, Julien Rouhaud a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:29 AM Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the
> > > documentation. The final
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:29 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the
> > documentation. The final outcome is that it can be difficult to
> > monitor the archiver state in such
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the
> documentation. The final outcome is that it can be difficult to
> monitor the archiver state in such case. That's orthogonal to this
> patch but maybe we can add a new
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 5:24 PM Benoit Lobréau wrote:
>
> I like the idea !
>
> If it's not too complicated, I'd like to take a stab at it.
Great! And it shouldn't be too complicated. Note that unfortunately
this will likely not be included in pg14 as the last commitfest should
begin today.
I like the idea !
If it's not too complicated, I'd like to take a stab at it.
Le lun. 1 mars 2021 à 10:16, Julien Rouhaud a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 4:33 PM Benoit Lobréau
> wrote:
> >
> > Le lun. 1 mars 2021 à 08:36, Michael Paquier a
> écrit :
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 4:33 PM Benoit Lobréau wrote:
>
> Le lun. 1 mars 2021 à 08:36, Michael Paquier a écrit :
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
>> > Done here : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3012/
>>
>> Documenting that properly for the archive
Le lun. 1 mars 2021 à 08:36, Michael Paquier a écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
> > Done here : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3012/
>
> Documenting that properly for the archive command, as already done for
> restore_command, sounds good to me. I
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:36 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
> > Done here : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3012/
>
> Documenting that properly for the archive command, as already done for
> restore_command, sounds good to me. I
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
> Done here : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3012/
Documenting that properly for the archive command, as already done for
restore_command, sounds good to me. I am not sure that there is much
point in doing a cross-reference to
Done here : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3012/
Le jeu. 25 févr. 2021 à 15:34, Julien Rouhaud a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 7:25 PM Benoit Lobréau
> wrote:
> >
> > Le mer. 24 févr. 2021 à 14:52, Julien Rouhaud a
> écrit :
> >>
> >> I thought that this behavior was documented,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 7:25 PM Benoit Lobréau wrote:
>
> Le mer. 24 févr. 2021 à 14:52, Julien Rouhaud a écrit :
>>
>> I thought that this behavior was documented, especially for the lack
>> of update of pg_stat_archiver. If it's not the case then we should
>> definitely fix that!
>
> I tried
Le mer. 24 févr. 2021 à 14:52, Julien Rouhaud a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:21 PM talk to ben wrote:
> >
> > The documentation describes how a return code > 125 on the
> restore_command would prevent the server from starting [1] :
> >
> > "
> > It is important that the command
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:21 PM talk to ben wrote:
>
> The documentation describes how a return code > 125 on the restore_command
> would prevent the server from starting [1] :
>
> "
> It is important that the command return nonzero exit status on failure. The
> command will be called
16 matches
Mail list logo
