Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
Le Mardi 18 Juin 2002 18:42, Serge Adda a ?crit :
I am new to PostgreSQL, but I am interested in the Win32 port.
I have studied the architecture of other databases like Oracle.
Hello,
It seems clear that several teams are working without central point
I've got patches for the CREATE CAST/DROP CAST feature (just a
rearrangement of our existing function declaration syntax). The SQL99
form assumes that an existing function will be used for the cast
definition, so I've extended the syntax to allow that and to have an
alternate form which has more
Tony Griffiths(RA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a) The client-side programmer has to be responsible for parsing the
returned string, which could cause problems if the output format of the
ADT is changed, and
You seem to be proposing that we instead expose the internal storage
format of the
Jan Wieck wrote:
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
[...]
As for current PostgreSQL organization, can someone explain me which W32 port
will make its way to PostgreSQL main source code? Can someone publish a
schedule for replication availability? Who is in charge of explaining newbees
that MySQL
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
[...]
As for current PostgreSQL organization, can someone explain me which W32 port
will make its way to PostgreSQL main source code? Can someone publish a
schedule for replication availability?
On 20 Jun 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote:
Nobody is in charge, but everybody is welcome to do it, even without
being elected or nominated ;)
Still, having a success stories or advocacy section on
www.postgresq.org seems like a good idea.
Being worked on ... we are actually working on totally
At 01:49 PM 6/20/02 +0100, Tony Griffiths(RA) wrote:
a) The client-side programmer has to be responsible for parsing the
returned string, which could cause problems if the output format of the
ADT is changed, and
b) The impedance mismatch is much greater than that of the built-in types.
One
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:09:35 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
- Replication: development is slow although a lot of people would be
interested in helping. But there is no central organization apart from the
hackers-list.
Replication development
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
This line bothers me. With multiple people working on Win32, I would
like us to decide how we would _like_ such a port to be implemented. I
think this will assist those working on the project to _know_ that their
work
Thomas Lockhart writes:
I've got patches for the CREATE CAST/DROP CAST feature (just a
rearrangement of our existing function declaration syntax). The SQL99
form assumes that an existing function will be used for the cast
definition, so I've extended the syntax to allow that and to have an
On Thursday 20 June 2002 02:57 pm, Jan Wieck wrote:
set of triggers where working, and then Stephan did all the others and I
forgot who else helped to do the utility commands and CREATE TABLE
syntax and tried to decrypt the SQL definitions?
Don Baccus?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1
Jan Wieck wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
...
IMHO, that is actually their problem ... without meaning to sound crass
about it, but its not like we haven't discussed it extensively here, and
openly ... hell, we've even tried to break down the whole project into
smaller components to
I see in ri_triggers.c:
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2002, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Copyright 1999 Jan Wieck
Jan, are you holding copyright on this or is it dual, and what does dual
mean in this case?
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
I'm also looking at the SQL99 INFORMATION_SCHEMA views. Is anyone
already defining these? Is someone interested in picking this up?
I've
got some definitions in a contrib-style directory but have not yet
mapped them to PostgreSQL.
I have a few of the basics done, but nothing really
Added to CVS.
---
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:46:07PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. If not,
$ cvs -z3 up -d -P
cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up
Hmm, been this way for a while now, something need budging? :)
-d
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Jan Wieck wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
This line bothers me. With multiple people working on Win32, I would
like us to decide how we would _like_ such a port to be implemented. I
think this will assist those
It could be helpful to create a mailing list just for this project,
since not all members of pg-hackers will/shall participate, and we
would probably flood this list quite a bit trying to figure out what
is the best way to implement a win32 port. Just like the
pg-replication list, this new list
Jon Franz wrote:
It could be helpful to create a mailing list just for this project,
since not all members of pg-hackers will/shall participate, and we
would probably flood this list quite a bit trying to figure out what
is the best way to implement a win32 port. Just like the
OK, I have finally decided that our archive searching stinks. I have
emails in my mailbox that don't appear in the archives.
Our main site, http://archives.postgresql.org/ doesn't archive the
'patches' list. (It isn't listed on the main site, and I can't find
postings via searching.) Also, why
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jon Franz wrote:
It could be helpful to create a mailing list just for this project,
since not all members of pg-hackers will/shall participate, and we
would probably flood this list quite a bit trying to figure out what
is the best way to
I have a few questions about what would be expected from coercing to a
type with constraints (Domains mostly -- but complex object types may
run into similar issues if implemented).
What I intend to do:
In gram.y, remove the application of typename directly to the A_Const
in makeTypeCast. Use
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
MS SQL Server has an interesting way of dealing with this. They have a
torn bit in each 512-byte chunk of a page, and this bit is set the
same for each chunk. When they are about to write out a page, they first
flip all of the torn bits and then
anoncvs, the lock cleared in the last hour. It didn't actually do any
waiting, it aborted almost immediately.
David
Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Ford wrote:
$ cvs -z3 up -d -P
cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up
Hmm, been this way for a while now, something need budging?
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Since it's currently all for collecting statistics on tables, why can't it
collect another type of statistic, like:
- How often the estimator gets it wrong?
At the end of an index scan, the executor could compare the number of rows
returned against what was
Jan Wieck wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I see in ri_triggers.c:
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2002, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Copyright 1999 Jan Wieck
Jan, are you holding copyright on this or is it dual, and what does dual
mean in this case?
Sure do I, do I?
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I hate to do that because it makes people think something special is
happening for hash, but it isn't. We could throw an elog(NOTICE)
stating that hash is not recommended and btree is faster, or something
like that.
I think the
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:50:04 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have thought that some type of feedback from the executor back into
the optimizer would be a good feature. Not sure how to do it, but your
idea makes sense. It certainly could update the table statistics after
Here are some class notes that contain some very good ideas with
terrific explanations:
http://www.cs.duke.edu/education/courses/fall01/cps216/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
We have documented current GiST interface but in russian.
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/doc/gist-inteface-r.shtml
We have no time to translate it to english :-)
I'd appreciate if somebody could help us in documentation -
Oleg
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom
30 matches
Mail list logo
