Austin Gonyou wrote:
What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the
7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA.
pg_dump?
Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgresql does hot backup for a long time.
Bye
Shridhar
---(end of
I have a problem with compile PostgreSQL from cvs with tag
REL7_4_STABLE
Error is 'ECPG_ARRAY_NONE is not declared' (in execute.c)
My fault. extern.h wasn't committed and I didn't notice. Sorry.
It should be fixed now.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 01:00, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Austin Gonyou wrote:
What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the
7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA.
pg_dump?
Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgresql does hot backup for a long time.
I
Austin Gonyou wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 01:00, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Austin Gonyou wrote:
What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the
7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA.
pg_dump?
Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgresql does hot backup for a
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:51:31PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Patrick Welche writes:
PostgreSQL 7.5devel on arm-unknown-netbsdelf1.6ZE, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC)
3.3.2-nb1
Can you test 7.4?
Several days of compiling later..
All 93 tests passed.
with 7.4rc2 on
I haven't seen any discussion on the topic, so thought I might start
one. We currently provide rpms for Red Hat 7.x, 8.x, and 9, and I'm
assuming that we'll have rpms for all of those for 7.4 once release time
rolls around. However, given that Red Hat is dropping support for 7.x
and 8.x version on
Austin Gonyou wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 01:00, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Austin Gonyou wrote:
What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the
7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA.
pg_dump?
Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgresql does hot backup for a
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for having
omitted Postgres (and MySQL!) from RHEL 3. If
LOG: could not bind socket for statistics collector: Cannot assign requested
address
Hmm ... that's sure the problem, but what can we do about it? ISTM that
any non-broken system ought to be able to resolve localhost. Actually
it's worse than that: your system resolved localhost and
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are we using an api that only returns nslookup responses and not
/etc/hosts entries ? At least on AIX it looks like it.
We use getaddrinfo(), or if that doesn't exist gethostbyname().
If there's a problem of that ilk then it's those library
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for having
omitted Postgres (and
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:23, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for
I wrote:
I just spent 15 minutes searching on the RH web site trying to locate
a complete list of packages in the various RHEL personalities, with
conspicuous lack of success. How anyone can make decisions about it
without knowing exactly what is in it is beyond me.
However, you can see a
Dear All,
I have compiled and tested Postgresql-7.4beta4 on SGI Irix
6.5.20 using the MIPS Pro 7.4 compilers and on SGI Altix using the gcc
2.96 compilers and both ports passed all tests within the limits of
numerical accuracy.
What is the URL for reporting successful ports? --Bob
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:32:38AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are we using an api that only returns nslookup responses and not
/etc/hosts entries ? At least on AIX it looks like it.
We use getaddrinfo(), or if that doesn't exist
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's always a good idea to put localhost into dns too.
Yeah, but localhost *is* resolving as something on Kiyoshi's
machine, else a different error message would have appeared.
I'm wondering just what it resolved to though --- maybe we should
have made the
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
Jan,
First of all we really appreciate that this is going to be an Open
Source project.
There is something I wanted to add from a marketing point of view: I
have done many public talks in the 2 years or so. There is one question
people keep asking me: How about the
Jan,
I am wondering if you are familar with the work covered in 'Recovery in
Parallel Database Systems' by Svein-Olaf Hvasshovd (Vieweg) ? The book is an
excellent detailed description covering high availablility DB
implementations.
I think your right on by not thinking smaller!!
Jordan
Jan,
This is EXACTLY what we have been waiting for (years) :) :) :).
If you need somebody for testing or documentation just drop me a line.
Cheers,
Hans
Jan Wieck wrote:
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
Jan,
First of all we really appreciate that this is going to be an Open
Source project.
Jordan Henderson wrote:
Jan,
I am wondering if you are familar with the work covered in 'Recovery in
Parallel Database Systems' by Svein-Olaf Hvasshovd (Vieweg) ? The book is an
excellent detailed description covering high availablility DB
implementations.
No, but it sounds like something I
I wrote:
What if we attack the problem head on --- make indexes able to handle
cross-datatype comparison operators directly? That would solve the
problem without *any* semantic side-effects. AFAIR we've never seriously
considered doing that; I guess anyone who thought of it dismissed it as
I have just committed the implementation of ARC into the 7.5devel tree.
This doesn't contain the vacuum page delay, or the test implementation
of the background writer based on the checkpoint process. These two need
some more discussion and bouncing around.
Jan
--
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just committed the implementation of ARC into the 7.5devel tree.
I'm seeing a whole bunch of regression test failures that weren't there
half an hour ago ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just committed the implementation of ARC into the 7.5devel tree.
I'm seeing a whole bunch of regression test failures that weren't there
half an hour ago ...
regards, tom lane
Oh ... hmmm ... will check
Jan
--
Jan Wieck wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just committed the implementation of ARC into the 7.5devel tree.
I'm seeing a whole bunch of regression test failures that weren't there
half an hour ago ...
regards, tom lane
Oh ... hmmm ... will check
That's
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:46:52 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's always a good idea to put localhost into dns too.
Yeah, but localhost *is* resolving as something on Kiyoshi's
machine, else a different error message would have appeared.
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's strange, if I reverse apply my patch I have buffer leak's and all
kinds of crap. Can't even initdb. Who else applied patches tonight?
Well, there was my operator-class patch (which went nowhere near the
buffer stuff) and also the initdb-in-C code (new
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's strange, if I reverse apply my patch I have buffer leak's and all
kinds of crap. Can't even initdb. Who else applied patches tonight?
FWIW, I can initdb --- that seems fine --- but the regression tests spew
lots of small fragments. What I suspect is
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can't even initdb. Who else applied patches tonight?
FWIW, I did make distclean, full rebuild, initdb on both HP and Linux
machines. The HP passes both serial and parallel regression tests.
The Linux machine initdb's, and simple manual queries seem to work,
Robert E. Bruccoleri wrote:
Dear All,
I have compiled and tested Postgresql-7.4beta4 on SGI Irix
6.5.20 using the MIPS Pro 7.4 compilers and on SGI Altix using the gcc
2.96 compilers and both ports passed all tests within the limits of
numerical accuracy.
What is the URL for
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 08:57 am, Robert Treat wrote:
I haven't seen any discussion on the topic, so thought I might start
one. We currently provide rpms for Red Hat 7.x, 8.x, and 9, and I'm
assuming that we'll have rpms for all of those for 7.4 once release time
rolls around. However,
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases.
The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1)
Tom applied a patch so that the build will continue to work on 8.0.x ...
or is this some other issue?
---(end of
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:39:49 +0900 Kiyoshi Sawada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ nslookup localhost
Server: name.server.mydomain
Address: xxx.xx.xx.xxx
: : :
(failed test)
Is it necessary to start a DNS server to bind 'localhost' in Kiyoshi's machine?
I got bind-9.2.2-sol8-intel-local
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 23:44, Lamar Owen wrote:
My hands are somewhat tied at the present to only supporting what I actively
run. That is currently RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 1. (not 1.0, incidentally;
there is no minor version).
Have you tried mach?
Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's strange, if I reverse apply my patch I have buffer leak's and all
kinds of crap. Can't even initdb. Who else applied patches tonight?
FWIW, I can initdb --- that seems fine --- but the regression tests spew
lots of small fragments. What
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Hans-J?rgen Sch?nig wrote:
an inferior product anyway. What I want to point out is that some people
want an alternative Oracle's Real Application Cluster. They want load
balancing and hot failover. Even data centers asking for replication did
not
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
Meanwhile we seem to be in a situation where PostgreSQL is rather
competing against Oracle than against MySQL. In our case there are more
people asking for Oracle - Pg migration than for MySQL - Pg. MySQL
does not seem to be the great enemy because most people
37 matches
Mail list logo
