Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems this commit forgot README fix.
http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/replication/walreceiver.h?r1=1.5r2=1.6
Thanks for the report!
Yep, thanks. Applied, and I also
2010/3/24 Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Personally I dislike idea some dictionary precompiler - it is next
application for maintaining and maybe not necessary.
That's the sort of thing that can be done when first required by any
backend and the results saved
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The main thing for me was that it logged something. The above two ways
occurred to me and figured we'd end up discussing it.
The first way is slightly confusing for the reason stated, agreed. By
using the same form of
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:36 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The main thing for me was that it logged something. The above two ways
occurred to me and figured we'd end up discussing it.
The first way is slightly confusing
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So we are allowing a database to be called REPLICATION?
Yes.
Surely there
are some significant problems in that case. How will access control to
that database work in the pg_hba.conf?
We can do that by enclosing the
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 19:49 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So we are allowing a database to be called REPLICATION?
Yes.
Surely there
are some significant problems in that case. How will access control to
that
Hi,
While i was studying the unique index checks very closely, i realized
that what we need is to find out whether the tuple is deleted / not. So say
a tuple is deleted by a transaction, but it is not dead( because of some
long running transaction ), still we can mark a hint bit as deleted and
Simon Riggs wrote:
So we might have a pg_hba.conf that looks like this
TYPE DATABASEUSER CIDR-ADDRESS METHOD
host replication foo 192.168.0.5 md5
host replication foo 192.168.0.5 md5
Which looks pretty strange.
I think we should change that, though if not we
Hi,
Why aren't installcheck-parallel, world, install-world and
installcheck-world declared as a PHONY target in Makefile.global.in?
The attached patch does that.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
phony_targets_v1.patch
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
but I don't see any mention of that in the docs. How about:
*** client-auth.sgml 24 Mar 2010 09:44:06 +0200 1.134
--- client-auth.sgml 24 Mar 2010 13:21:16 +0200
***
***
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 20:30 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
but I don't see any mention of that in the docs. How about:
+1
Yes, plus a mention in the rep docs.
That probably tips the balance towards
How are you going to unmark the hint bit in case of a rollback?
Only after you find that the transaction is committed, this hint bit has to
be set. It is equivalent to any other hint bit.
Gokul.
Fujii Masao wrote:
But in the current (v8.4 or before) behavior, recovery ends normally
when an invalid record is found in an archived WAL file. Otherwise,
the server would never be able to start normal processing when there
is a corrupted archived file for some reasons. So, that invalid
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
What's the word on when you guys will be finished with the open items
list for SR?
Sorry, I'm not sure when.
Now, I'm trying to address the open item Walreceiver is not
interruptible on win32.
It might take time to
On 24/03/2010 6:29 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
So we are allowing a database to be called REPLICATION? Surely there
are some significant problems in that case. How will access control to
that database work in the pg_hba.conf?
Surely it should be consistent with template0 and postgres:
template1=#
Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
Why aren't installcheck-parallel, world, install-world and
installcheck-world declared as a PHONY target in Makefile.global.in?
Lack of make-fu, probably.
The attached patch does that.
Thanks. Applied.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hmm, true, this changes behavior over previous releases. I tend to think
that it's always an error if there's a corrupt file in the archive,
though, and PANIC is appropriate. If the administrator
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. That's easily fixable (applies over the previous patch):
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -3773,7 +3773,7 @@ retry:
pagelsn.xrecoff = 0;
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/3/24 Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Personally I dislike idea some dictionary precompiler - it is next
application for maintaining and maybe not necessary.
That's the sort of thing that can be done when first required by any
2010/3/24 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/3/24 Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Personally I dislike idea some dictionary precompiler - it is next
application for maintaining and maybe not necessary.
That's the sort of thing
Gokulakannan Somasundaram gokul...@gmail.com writes:
While i was studying the unique index checks very closely, i realized
that what we need is to find out whether the tuple is deleted / not. So say
a tuple is deleted by a transaction, but it is not dead( because of some
long running
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/3/24 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/3/24 Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Personally I dislike idea some dictionary precompiler - it is next
application for maintaining and maybe not necessary.
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
OK, what would the TODO text be?
I think there are really two tasks here:
* preprocess the textual dictionary definition files into something
that can be slurped directly into memory;
* use mmap() instead of read() to read preprocessed files into memory,
it seems fairly unlikely to me that this would be useful enough to
justify using up a precious hint bit. The applicability of the hint
is very short-term --- as soon as the tuple is dead to all transactions,
it can be marked with the existing LP_DEAD hint bit. And if it's only
useful for
Well, I didn't actually think that this patch
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-03/msg00181.php
would yield much insight, but lookee what we have here:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jaguardt=2010-03-24%2004:00:07
[4ba99150.5099:483] LOG: statement:
Markus Wanner wrote:
Hi,
A git repository for dtester as well as some integration code for
testing Postgres based projects is available at:
http://git.postgres-r.org/
Markus,
I'm having some issues pulling from your git repository
$ git fetch postgres-dtest
fatal:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2010-03-22 at 19:38 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
But if we are not comfortable about being able to do that safely, I
would be OK with just raising an error if a concatenation is
attempted
where one value contains a DTD. The impact in practice
On ons, 2010-03-24 at 14:51 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Actually, I have come to the conclusion that the biggest problem in
this
area is that we accept XML documents with a leading DOCTYPE node at
all.
Our docs state:
The xml type can store well-formed documents, as defined by the
Steve,
Steve Singer wrote:
$ git clone http://git.postgres-r.org/dtester
Initialized empty Git repository in
/local/home/ssinger/src/dtester/dtester/.git/
fatal: http://git.postgres-r.org/dtester/info/refs download error - The
requested URL returned error: 500
Oh, thank you for pointing
On 24/03/10 21:06, Markus Wanner wrote:
Steve,
Steve Singer wrote:
$ git clone http://git.postgres-r.org/dtester
Initialized empty Git repository in
/local/home/ssinger/src/dtester/dtester/.git/
fatal: http://git.postgres-r.org/dtester/info/refs download error -
The requested URL returned
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Our version of SQL/XML support references SQL:2003 which references XML
1.0, where omitting the XMLDecl is legal. You can't omit the XMLDecl in
XML 1.1, because you need it to communicate the fact that it's version
1.1.
Hmm. OK. Well here is a patch that tries
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Hmm. OK. Well here is a patch that tries to fix the xmlconcat error,
anyway. It seems to work, but maybe could stand a little tightening.
I liked your previous idea (rethink the whole mess in 9.1) better.
As far as the patch itself is concerned, the
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Hmm. OK. Well here is a patch that tries to fix the xmlconcat error,
anyway. It seems to work, but maybe could stand a little tightening.
I liked your previous idea (rethink the whole mess in 9.1) better.
As far as the
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 14:31 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Fujii Masao wrote:
But in the current (v8.4 or before) behavior, recovery ends normally
when an invalid record is found in an archived WAL file. Otherwise,
the server would never be able to start normal processing when there
is
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
PANICing won't change the situation, so it just destroys server
availability. If we had 1 master and 42 slaves then this behaviour would
take down almost the whole server farm at once. Very uncool.
You might have reason
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
OK. How about making the startup process emit WARNING, stop WAL replay and
wait for the presence of trigger file, when an invalid record is found?
Which keeps the server up for readonly queries. And if the trigger file is
found, I think that the
36 matches
Mail list logo
