Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
So you'd prefer a message that is sometimes flat-out wrong over a
message that is correct but less informative in the common case? I
guess that could be right call, but it's not what I'd pick.
Well, as I said, I think the only way
Robert Haas wrote:
I've realized another problem with this patch. standby_keep_segments
only controls the number of segments that we keep around for purposes
of streaming: it doesn't affect archiving at all. And of course, a
standby server based on archiving is every bit as much of a standby
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 23:28 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
What is Prioritised Todo? It looks like a copy of the TODO list that
was created on March 23, 2010, and only you and Simon have modified it:
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 00:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
So you'd prefer a message that is sometimes flat-out wrong over a
message that is correct but less informative in the common case? I
guess that could be right call, but it's not what I'd pick.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Looking at the call-sites, there are bugs now - if PQexec() returns
NULL, we don't deal with it. It also doesn't always free the result
properly. I've added checks for that.
I
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
The patch also seems confused about whether it's intending to be a
general-purpose solution or not. You can maybe take some shortcuts
if it's
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
[ back to this... ]
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 21:06, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I suppose we had a reason for doing it the first way but I can't see
what. GMT seems a fairly
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 21:01, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
... lack either the note about defaulting to GMT or the hint. I guess
we should add both of those to the failure
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
This script should probably live in CVS, and be run when Microsoft
releases new timezone data. Where should I put it - src/timezone or
somewhere in
Simon,
* Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
So instead of the typical reject instruction we also add a
rejectverbose instruction that has a more verbose message. Docs would
describe it as an additional instruction to assist with debugging a
complex pg_hba.conf, with warning that if
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
So instead of the typical reject instruction we also add a
rejectverbose instruction that has a more verbose message.
Erm, so we'd add an option for this? That strikes me as pretty
excessive.
I think
On Wed, April 14, 2010 08:23, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Erik Rijkers wrote:
This replication test that was working well earlier (it ran daily), stopped
working
This is probably because of this change:
date: 2010/04/12 09:52:29; author: heikki; state: Exp; lines: +71 -23
Change the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-04/msg00077.php
As for the code itself, don't we need a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in there
for it
Robert Haas escribió:
In the department of minor nits, I also don't like the fact that the
GUC is called standby_keep_segments and the variable is called
StandbySegments. If we really have to capitalize them differently, we
should at least make it StandbyKeepSegments, but personally I think
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:37:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
What's wrong with something like connection not permitted or
connection not authorized?
The
Erik Rijkers wrote:
Btw, typo alert: documentation 18.5.4, subhead 'standby_keep_segments',
says: 'replciation' for 'replication'.
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-wal.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-REPLICATION
Thanks, fixed.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB
Hi there,
below is an example of interesting query and two plans - the bad plan, which
uses merge join and big sorting, took 216 sec, and good plan with merge join disabled took
8 sec. Sorry for odd names, they were generated by popular accounting
engine in Russia. 8.4.3 and HEAD show the
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote:
Sorry for odd names, they were generated by popular accounting
engine in Russia.
How much of that can you trim out and still see the problem?
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
I needed a way to run diffs on two
database dumps to see what data developers put in their
local databases versus the initial database load. The
pg_dump utility with --inserts works well for this, but
since the order in which the data is returned of the server
is not guaranteed I hacked this
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote:
Sorry for odd names, they were generated by popular accounting
engine in Russia.
How much of that can you trim out and still see the problem?
It's difficult, since I don't know semantics of data. I reduced
On tor, 2010-04-15 at 10:48 -0700, Bob Lunney wrote:
I needed a way to run diffs on two
database dumps to see what data developers put in their
local databases versus the initial database load.
Maybe pg_comparator would help you?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Apparently, pgindent replaces multiple spaces in comments by a tab
(possibly subject to additional logic). An example among thousands:
Hello
there is significant problem in statistics I think,
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2010/4/15 Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote:
Sorry for odd names, they were generated by popular accounting
engine in Russia.
How
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
there is significant problem in statistics I think,
Ah, you're right !
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2010/4/15 Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote:
Sorry for odd names,
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su writes:
below is an example of interesting query and two plans - the bad plan, which
uses merge join and big sorting, took 216 sec, and good plan with merge join
disabled took
8 sec.
The good plan seems to be fast mainly because of heavily cached inner
Greg Smith wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/User:Simon
Well, unless Simon wants to keep it for some reason, it should be
removed, and if kept, renamed. Simon?
I already retitled the copy left on the personal page and deleted the
one that was causing the
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm not sure how much it would help to increase the statistics
targets, but that would be worth trying.
I notice that the scan rowcount estimates are very accurate, there's
that one hash join result that's way off, though.
What's up with the sort of
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
What's up with the sort of _accrged7200 (in the slower plan) taking
in 3.5 million rows and putting out 1 row? There's something there
I'm not understanding.
It's under a merge join, so what probably happened is that the first
row from that
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
I've realized another problem with this patch. standby_keep_segments
only controls the number of segments that we keep around for purposes
of streaming: it doesn't affect
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tor, 2010-04-15 at 10:48 -0700, Bob Lunney wrote:
I needed a way to run diffs on two
database dumps to see what data developers put in their
local databases versus the initial database load.
Maybe pg_comparator would help you?
Or DBIx::Compare if you
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Apparently, pgindent replaces multiple spaces in comments by a tab
(possibly subject to additional logic). An example among thousands:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote:
On general thought I've had is that it would be nice if the first
attempt to SELECT against a table with no statistics would trigger an
automatic ANALYZE by the backend on which the query was executed.
the 8.4.3 binary tarball for solaris sparc
64bit on postgresql.com was shipped with the 32bit includes and the
Makefile fragments from 8.4-community/lib/64/pgxs/src/
I'm specifically hitting this contradition:
$ grep FLOAT8 include/server/pg_config.h
#define FLOAT8PASSBYVAL false
and
$
Thanks for the suggestion, Peter. It looks like pg_comparator is for comparing
the contents of two different servers. I need to compare the contents of two
dump files from the same server separated by time and busy developers.
Regards,
Bob Lunney
--- On Thu, 4/15/10, Peter Eisentraut
34 matches
Mail list logo
