( Quotation from
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg01396.php )
STEP1: Make startup process to acquire backup-end-position from
not only backup-end record but also backup-history-file .
* startup process allows to acquire backup-end-position
On 14.06.2011 09:03, Jun Ishiduka wrote:
( Quotation from
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg01396.php )
STEP1: Make startup process to acquire backup-end-position from
not only backup-end record but also backup-history-file .
* startup process
I still think that's headed in the wrong direction.
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg01405.php)
Please check these mails, and teach the reason for content of the wrong
direction.
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-06/msg00209.php)
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
I've already implemented some simple qual pushdown in the redis FDW,
and am planning to do something similar for MySQL - however I won't be
surprised if I have to rewrite redisGetQual in
On 14 June 2011 05:17, Franklin Haut franklin.h...@gmail.com wrote:
hi people, postgresql goes down on a WindowsXP SP3 machine.
there a script to reproduce. (on XP with 8.4 works fine)
CREATE DATABASE teste
WITH OWNER = postgres
ENCODING = 'UTF8'
TABLESPACE = pg_default
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:59:38PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I propose that we move parse2.pl to parse.pl and only keep the one.
I agree, thanks for taking care.
Originally I wanted to keep parse.pl around for a bit, so I could run both and
compare the output over the development cycle.
Hi,
I would like to propose support for per-column generic option, which is
defined in the SQL/MED standard. In 9.0 release, support for foreign
tables and per-table generic option have been added, but support for
per-column generic option hasn't.
Please examine the description below and
On Jun14, 2011, at 07:15 , Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
No, it does not. Under what circumstances should I issue a suggestion
to reindex, and what should the text be?
It sounds like GIN
On 13.06.2011 22:33, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangasheikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 13.06.2011 21:31, Tom Lane wrote:
So far as I can tell, that breaks pg_upgrade (if there are any open
prepared transactions) for no redeeming social benefit.
Surely pg_upgrade can't work
On Jun13, 2011, at 21:24 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2011-06-08 at 10:14 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
But then you lose the ability to evaluate user-supplied
XPath expressions, because there's no way of telling which of these
function to use.
Perhaps having both variants, one type-safe
On Jun13, 2011, at 16:19 , Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 06/13/2011 10:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Some languages use =~ and some use just ~... I was just
wondering if anyone thought the commutator of =~ was ~=...
My feeling is it's a bit dangerous. It's too easy to fat-finger the reverse
op, and
On Jun13, 2011, at 05:44 , Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
(B) There should be a way to use ANY()/ALL() with the
array elements becoming the left arguments of the operator.
It seems to me that if
On 10.06.2011 19:05, Kevin Grittner wrote:
I found that pgindent would like to tweak whitespace in three places
in that patch, and I found an unnecessary include that I would like
to remove. Normally, I would post a new version of the patch with
those adjustments, but there's been a disquieting
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Profiling reveals that the system spends enormous amounts of CPU time
in s_lock. LWLOCK_STATS reveals that the only lwlock with significant
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Franklin Haut franklin.h...@gmail.com wrote:
hi people, postgresql goes down on a WindowsXP SP3 machine.
there a script to reproduce. (on XP with 8.4 works fine)
There is a crash related to time zone handling that was fixed in 9.1beta2.
--
Robert Haas
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:21:05AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
This probably would not replace a backend-local counter of processed
messages
for
The attached patch is a preparation to rework implementation of DROP statement
using a common code. That intends to apply get_object_address() to resolve name
of objects to be removed, and eventually minimizes the number of places to put
permission checks.
Its first step is an enhancement of
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm not sure that pg_upgrade is a good vehicle for dispensing such
advice, anyway. At least in the Red Hat packaging, end users will never
read what it prints, unless maybe it fails outright and they're trying
to debug why.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun jun 13 18:38:46 -0400 2011:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Is putting remotes in your ~/.gitconfig good practice? I certainly
don't have any in mine.
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Ok, I've renumbered the existing RMs back the way they were.
Don't we also need something like the attached?
-Kevin
ssi-twophase-c.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
I haven't looked at the patch yet, but here are a few comments on the
design, which overall looks good.
2011/6/14 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com:
1) psql should support describing per-column generic options, so \dec
command was added. If the form \dec+ is used, generic options are
On 14.06.2011 15:14, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Ok, I've renumbered the existing RMs back the way they were.
Don't we also need something like the attached?
Yes. I just committed a fix for that after noticing that the buildfarm
didn't like it. Sorry..
--
Heikki
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:10 PM, richhguard-monot...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Apologies - I meant to CC in the list but forgot.
I have gone through and changed all the related functions except
``update_attstats''.
Do you have any advice of how to handle the inner loops, such as those
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun13, 2011, at 05:44 , Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
(B) There should be a way to use ANY()/ALL() with the
array elements
Hass,
there problem are fixed in 9.1beta2, and now works.
thanks
2011/6/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Franklin Haut franklin.h...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi people, postgresql goes down on a WindowsXP SP3 machine.
there a script to reproduce. (on XP
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun jun 13 18:38:46 -0400 2011:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Is putting remotes in your ~/.gitconfig ?good practice? I certainly
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I understand now --- that it is risky to create an origin branch in
~/.gitconfig. ?I am now using an alias:
? ? ? ?[alias]
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?pgclone = clone
ssh://g...@gitmaster.postgresql.org/postgresql.git
I assume the 'github' branch in ~/.gitconfig
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 14:40, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun jun 13 18:38:46 -0400 2011:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Is
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:44 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote:
I was reading the partitioning docs when I spotted this. I think it means to
highlight the advantages of DROP TABLE over DELETE rather than ALTER TABLE.
I guess they might mean ALTER TABLE .. NO INHERIT. But I think
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
No, pg_upgrade should not be unilaterally refusing that.
Uh, isn't there some physical files in pg_twophase/ that stick around to
keep prepared transactions --- if so, pg_upgrade does not copy them from
the old
On Jun14, 2011, at 14:29 , Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun13, 2011, at 05:44 , Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
(B) There should be a way
Excerpts from richhguard-monotone's message of lun jun 13 16:10:17 -0400 2011:
Apologies - I meant to CC in the list but forgot.
I have gone through and changed all the related functions except
``update_attstats''.
Do you have any advice of how to handle the inner loops, such as those
Version of patch with few more comments and some fixes.
--
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.
arrayanalyze-0.4.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
2011/5/16 Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com:
Cédric Villemain wrote:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/c2main/postgres.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/analyze_cache
This rebases easily to make Cedric's changes move to the end; I just pushed
a version with that change to
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from richhguard-monotone's message of lun jun 13 16:10:17 -0400 2011:
Do you have any advice of how to handle the inner loops, such as those
initializing ``stakindN''. The entries before can be handled just like in
this patch, by
Excerpts from David E. Wheeler's message of lun jun 13 17:44:05 -0400 2011:
I was reading the partitioning docs when I spotted this. I think it means to
highlight the advantages of DROP TABLE over DELETE rather than ALTER TABLE.
I think the point of the existing wording is to point out
ALTER
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from richhguard-monotone's message of lun jun 13 16:10:17 -0400
2011:
Do you have any advice of how to handle the inner loops, such as those
initializing
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 14 10:30:28 -0400 2011:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from richhguard-monotone's message of lun jun 13 16:10:17 -0400
2011:
Do you have any advice of how to handle the inner loops, such as those
initializing
2011/6/3 Mark Kirkwood mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz:
On 02/06/11 18:34, Jaime Casanova wrote:
- the patch adds this to serial_schedule but no test has been added...
diff --git a/src/test/regress/serial_schedule
b/src/test/regress/serial_schedule
index bb654f9..325cb3d 100644
---
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I did some further changes, refactoring SkipSerialization so that
it's hopefully more readable, and added a comment about the
side-effects. See attached. Let me know if I'm missing something.
I do think the changes improve
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from David E. Wheeler's message of lun jun 13 17:44:05 -0400 2011:
I was reading the partitioning docs when I spotted this. I think it means to
highlight the advantages of DROP TABLE over DELETE rather than ALTER TABLE.
I think the
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
0001-Add-reloscache-column-to-pg_class.patch
0002-Add-a-function-to-update-the-new-pg_class-cols.patch
0003-Add-ANALYZE-OSCACHE-VERBOSE-relation.patch
0004-Add-a-Hook-to-handle-OSCache-stats.patch
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Yes, that's correct. We can remove them from the normal commit record
when nmsgs == 0.
Leonardo, can you submit an updated version of this patch today that
incorporates Simon's suggestion? The CommitFest starts tomorrow.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/24 Andrew Tipton andrew.t.tip...@gmail.com:
While playing around with the BOX and POINT datatypes, I was surprised to
note that BOX @ POINT (and likewise POINT @ BOX) queries were not using
the GiST index I had
I have left update_attstat which I'm unsure about, and have attached the
updated patch handling the other cases. This will be linked in via the
commitfest page.
I picked commands/comment.c randomly and found the i = 0, i++ method of
initializing the array made it harder for me to visualize
2011/6/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
0001-Add-reloscache-column-to-pg_class.patch
0002-Add-a-function-to-update-the-new-pg_class-cols.patch
0003-Add-ANALYZE-OSCACHE-VERBOSE-relation.patch
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I use psql's -E mode every now and then, copy-and-pasting and further
tweaking the SQL displayed. Most queries are displayed terminated by a
semicolon, but quite a few aren't, making copy-and-paste just a bit
On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
- commandALTER TABLE/ is far faster than a bulk operation.
+ commandALTER TABLE/ (to split out a sub-table from the partitioned
+ table) and commandDROP TABLE/ (to remove a partition altogether)
are
+ both far faster than a
Excerpts from David E. Wheeler's message of mar jun 14 12:33:27 -0400 2011:
On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
- commandALTER TABLE/ is far faster than a bulk operation.
+ commandALTER TABLE/ (to split out a sub-table from the
partitioned
+ table) and
On Jun 13, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
If we were going to make changes like this, I'd suggest we save them
up in a big bag for when we change major version number. Everybody in
the world thinks that PostgreSQL v8 is compatible across all versions
(8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4), and it
Jim Nasby wrote:
On Jun 13, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
If we were going to make changes like this, I'd suggest we save them
up in a big bag for when we change major version number. Everybody in
the world thinks that PostgreSQL v8 is compatible across all versions
(8.0, 8.1,
On Jun 13, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I looked into $SUBJECT. There appear to be two distinct issues:
1. On colugos (OS X with LLVM), the
...
However, because when using gcc that only results in a warning,
we didn't back-patch it. Now it appears that it's an
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Done that way (9.0 and beyond).
Re-reading the actual commit, I notice that there's now a grammatical
problem: the following sentence says
It also entirely avoids the commandVACUUM/command
overhead caused by a bulk commandDELETE/.
On 06/14/2011 11:04 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Even if the data were accurate and did not cause plan stability, we
have no evidence that using it will improve real-world performance.
That's the dependency Cédric has provided us a way to finally make
progress on. Everyone says there's no
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 06/14/2011 11:04 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Even if the data were accurate and did not cause plan stability, we
have no evidence that using it will improve real-world performance.
That's the dependency Cédric has provided
On 06/14/2011 11:44 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
Wouldn't it be better still to have both the new and old columns
available for a while? That would produce the minimum amount of
disruption to tools, etc.
Doing this presumes the existence of a large number of tools where the
author is unlikely to be
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
1. ANALYZE happens far too infrequently to believe that any data taken
at ANALYZE time will still be relevant at execution time.
ANALYZE happens when people execute it, else it is auto-analyze and I
am
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Anyway, I want a larger change to pg_stat_activity than this one
Well, Simon recomended to have a big bag of changes that justify break
tools... and you have presented a good one item for that bag...
Maybe we should start
ProcGlobalShmemSize() currently includes code to allow space for
startupBufferPinWaitBufId. But I think that's redundant, because that
variable is stored in PROC_HDR *ProcGlobal, for which this function is
separately allocating space.
So I propose to apply the attached patch, barring objections.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Anyway, I want a larger change to pg_stat_activity than this one
Well, Simon recomended to have a big bag of changes that justify break
Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Doing this presumes the existence of a large number of tools where
the author is unlikely to be keeping up with PostgreSQL
development. I don't believe that theorized set of users actually
exists.
There could be a number of queries used for
Currently, the planner and executor are mostly independent of each
other: the planner doesn't really know when the plan will be executed,
and the executor doesn't know how recently the plan was made.
We can work out the various paths through the traffic cop to see when
a plan will be a one-shot -
Simon Riggs wrote:
Currently, the planner and executor are mostly independent of each
other: the planner doesn't really know when the plan will be executed,
and the executor doesn't know how recently the plan was made.
We can work out the various paths through the traffic cop to see when
a
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Yes, that's correct. We can remove them from the normal commit record
when nmsgs == 0.
Leonardo, can you submit an updated version of this patch
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
Currently, the planner and executor are mostly independent of each
other: the planner doesn't really know when the plan will be executed,
and the executor doesn't know how recently the plan was made.
We
Hello,
Because, I work a little bit on streaming protocol and from time to
time I have crashes. I want ask if you wont crash reporting (this is one
of minors products from mmap playing) those what I have there is mmaped
areas, and call stacks, and some other stuff. This based reports works
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
Currently, the planner and executor are mostly independent of each
other: the planner doesn't really know when the plan will be executed,
and the executor doesn't know how recently
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:44 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote:
I was reading the partitioning docs when I spotted this. I think it means to
highlight the advantages of DROP TABLE over DELETE rather than ALTER TABLE.
Best,
David
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
Bruce Momjian wrote:
This argument seems a tad peculiar, since the *entire* *point* of
pg_upgrade is to push physical files from one installation into another
even though compatibility isn't guaranteed. It is the program's duty to
understand enough to know whether it can transport the
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
We don't need to be in a hurry here. As the reviewer I'm happy to give
Leonardo some time, obviously no more than the end of the commit fest.
Well, we certainly have the option to review and commit the patch any
time up
2011/6/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
1. ANALYZE happens far too infrequently to believe that any data taken
at ANALYZE time will still be relevant at execution time.
ANALYZE happens when
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 14 13:04:30 -0400 2011:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Done that way (9.0 and beyond).
Re-reading the actual commit, I notice that there's now a grammatical
problem: the following sentence says
It also entirely avoids
Excerpts from Josh Kupershmidt's message of sáb may 07 16:40:35 -0300 2011:
And while I'm griping about describe.c, is it just me or is the source
code indentation in that file totally screwy? I'm using emacs and I've
loaded the snippet for pgsql-c-mode from
./src/tools/editors/emacs.samples
How much do we care about applying perltidy, as described in
src/tools/msvc/README, everywhere? I just ran it across the entire
tree, using
perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws -l=100 -ole=unix **/*.pl **/*.pm
and it generated 6531 lines of (unified) diff, of which 357 are in
src/tools/msvc/ itself. So
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
How much do we care about applying perltidy, as described in
src/tools/msvc/README, everywhere? I just ran it across the entire
tree, using
perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws -l=100 -ole=unix **/*.pl **/*.pm
and it generated 6531 lines of (unified) diff, of which 357 are
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 21:39, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
How much do we care about applying perltidy, as described in
src/tools/msvc/README, everywhere? I just ran it across the entire
tree, using
perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws -l=100 -ole=unix **/*.pl
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I noticed that pgbench's doCustom (the function highest in the profile
posted) returns doing nothing if the connection is supposed to be
sleeping; seems an open door for busy waiting. I didn't check the
rest of
Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com writes:
This is actually a request for documentation guidance. I intend to
develop an extension to postgresql. Basically I'd like to place calls
to network using ZeroMQ, and I need to have detailed information about
You didn't tell us about what
Stack trace, nothing else. Now that the horse has left the barn, I changed to keep error builds...Process: postgres [17457]Path: /Volumes/High
On 06/14/2011 02:27 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
...
so it seems that sysbench is actually significantly less overhead than
pgbench and the lower throughput at the higher conncurency seems to be
cause by sysbench
Robert Creager robert.crea...@oracle.com wrote:
Stack trace, nothing else.
3 postgres 0x00010005cafa
multixact_twophase_postcommit + 74 (multixact.c:1367)
4 postgres 0x00010005deab
ProcessRecords + 91 (twophase.c:1407)
5
On 06/14/2011 02:20 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Just on our Wiki pages we have some queries available for copy/paste
which would need multiple
versions while both column names were in supported versions of the
software:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_dependency_information
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar jun 14 12:59:15 -0400 2011:
Well, someone doing SELECT *, which is probably 90% of the users, are
going to be pretty confused by duplicate columns, asking, What is the
difference? For those people this would make things worse than they
are now.
Excerpts from Cédric Villemain's message of mar jun 14 10:29:36 -0400 2011:
Attached are updated patches without the plugin itself. I've also
added the cache_page_cost GUC, this one is not per tablespace, like
others page_cost.
There are 6 patches:
With gcc 4.6, I get this warning:
dblink.c: In function ‘dblink_send_query’:
dblink.c:620:7: warning: variable ‘freeconn’ set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
I don't know much about the internals of dblink, but judging from the
surrounding code, I guess that this fix is necessary:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Currently, the planner and executor are mostly independent of each
other: the planner doesn't really know when the plan will be executed,
and the executor doesn't know how recently the plan was made.
We can work out the various paths through the
Robert Creager robert.crea...@oracle.com wrote:
You believe it was related to the flurry of errors that popped up
then.
I haven't looked at all the error in the flurry. I think your
particular report is consistent with being caused by this commit:
On tis, 2011-06-14 at 13:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
There are real problems with the idea of having one release where we
break everything that we want to break - mostly from a process
standpoint. We aren't always good at being organized and disciplined,
and coming up with a multi-year plan
2011/6/14 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com:
Excerpts from Cédric Villemain's message of mar jun 14 10:29:36 -0400 2011:
Attached are updated patches without the plugin itself. I've also
added the cache_page_cost GUC, this one is not per tablespace, like
others page_cost.
There are
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun jun 13 18:08:12 -0400 2011:
Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of sáb jun 11 09:32:15 -0400 2011:
I think that you also need to update the constraint exclusion code
(get_relation_constraints() or nearby), otherwise the planner might
exclude a
Excerpts from Cédric Villemain's message of mar jun 14 17:10:20 -0400 2011:
If we can have ALTER TABLE running on heavy workload, why not.
I am bit scared by the effect of such reloption, it focus on HINT
oriented strategy when I would like to allow a dynamic strategy from
the server. This
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun jun 13 18:08:12 -0400 2011:
Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of sáb jun 11 09:32:15 -0400 2011:
I think that you also need to update the constraint exclusion
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 06/13/2011 08:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I looked into $SUBJECT. There appear to be two distinct issues:
...
I think we can be a bit more liberal about build patches than things
that can affect the runtime behaviour.
So +1 for fixing both of
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tis, 2011-06-14 at 13:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
There are real problems with the idea of having one release where we
break everything that we want to break - mostly from a process
standpoint. We aren't always good at being organized and disciplined,
and
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tis, 2011-06-14 at 13:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
There are real problems with the idea of having one release where we
break everything that we want to break - mostly from a process
standpoint. We aren't always good at being organized and
On 06/14/2011 05:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net writes:
On 06/13/2011 08:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I looked into $SUBJECT. There appear to be two distinct issues:
...
I think we can be a bit more liberal about build patches than things
that can affect the runtime
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Cédric Villemain's message of mar jun 14 10:29:36 -0400 2011:
0001-Add-reloscache-column-to-pg_class.patch
Hmm, do you really need this to be a new column? Would it work to have
it be a reloption?
If it's to be updated in the
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 06/14/2011 05:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I've committed patches that fix these issues on my own OS X machine,
Well, OSX is just using our usual *nix paraphernalia, so if it's broken
won't all such platforms probably be broken too?
Yes, certainly.
On 06/14/2011 01:16 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But there's no reason that code (which may or may not eventually prove
useful) has to be incorporated into the main tree. We don't commit
code so people can go benchmark it; we ask for the benchmarking to be
done first, and then if the results are
Greg Smith wrote:
On 06/14/2011 01:16 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But there's no reason that code (which may or may not eventually prove
useful) has to be incorporated into the main tree. We don't commit
code so people can go benchmark it; we ask for the benchmarking to be
done first, and
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
