On 25 January 2013 20:29, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The checksums patch also introduces another behavior into
SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave, which is to write an XLOG_HINT WAL record
if checksums are enabled (to avoid torn page hazards). That's only
necessary for changes where
On 25 January 2013 17:19, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
We
could easily run across a system where pg_class order happens to be
better than anything else we come up with.
I think you should read that back to yourself and see if you still
feel the word easily applies here.
I agree
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:17 AM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:53 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if the fix discussed in the above thread solves my problem.
I
found the following differences between
All,
So while testing some replication stuff on 9.2.2 I discovered that it's
completely possible to connect a replica to itself. Seems like we ought
to at least be able to detect and log *that*.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:42:48PM +0800, Chen Huajun wrote:
I found the ecpg programs can not output the native language messages which
defined in ecpglib6-9.x.mo.
The reason is a misstake in src/interfaces/ecpg/ecpglib/misc.c,
and i mad a patch for that.
Thanks for finding an fixing the
From: Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:17 AM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
Although you said the fix will solve my problem, I don't feel it will.
The
discussion is about the crash when the standby restarts after the
primary
vacuums and truncates a table. On
On 27 January 2013 11:30, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
So while testing some replication stuff on 9.2.2 I discovered that it's
completely possible to connect a replica to itself. Seems like we ought
to at least be able to detect and log *that*.
How do we do that?
--
Simon Riggs
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
So... what happens when recovery ends? Do the settings loaded from
recovery.conf get reverted, or what?
With current patch the settings are kept if set in postgresql.conf and
discarded if they are loaded as GUC
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
If we attempted to defer the FPI last thing before write, we'd need to
cope with the case that writes at checkpoint occur after the logical
start of the checkpoint, and also with the overhead of additional
writes at
On 13-01-26 11:11 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
My understanding is that if the command string we give to event triggers
is ambiguous (sub-object names, schema qualifications, etc), it comes
useless for logical
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 25 January 2013 17:19, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
We
could easily run across a system where pg_class order happens to be
better than anything else we come up with.
I think you should read that back to
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Steve Singer ssin...@ca.afilias.info wrote:
On 13-01-26 11:11 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
My understanding is that if the command string we give to event triggers
is ambiguous
On 13-01-22 11:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
I pushed a new rebased version (the xlogreader commit made it annoying
to merge).
The main improvements are
* way much coherent code internally for intializing logical rep
* explicit control over slots
* options for logical replication
Exactly
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
That's what it sounds like - confirming that PostgreSQL is really fully
shut down.
I'm not sure how you could do that over a protocol connection, myself.
I'd just read the postmaster pid from the pidfile on disk and then `kill
-0` it in a delay loop
2013/1/27 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
That's what it sounds like - confirming that PostgreSQL is really fully
shut down.
I'm not sure how you could do that over a protocol connection, myself.
I'd just read the postmaster pid from the pidfile on
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
The current patch implementation is to fill in the object id, name and
schema with NULL when we have something else than a single object as the
target. I did that when I realized we have a precedent with statement
triggers and that we would maybe share
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
2013/1/20 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
The traditional answer to that, which not only can be done already in
all existing releases but is infinitely more flexible than any
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
So while testing some replication stuff on 9.2.2 I discovered that it's
completely possible to connect a replica to itself. Seems like we ought
to at least be able to detect and log *that*.
We could certainly alter the
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
2013/1/20 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
The traditional answer to that, which not only can be done already in
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Wed, January 23, 2013 08:36, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Hi!
Some quick answers to the part of notes/issues. I will provide rest of
answers soon.
[...]
trgm-regexp-0.10.patch.gz27 k
Trying to build this I
Peter Geoghegan peter.geoghega...@gmail.com writes:
On 26 January 2013 22:36, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm inclined to remove the requirements business altogether and just
document that these fields may be supplied, or words to that effect.
I think we may be talking at cross
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
The current patch implementation is to fill in the object id, name and
schema with NULL when we have something else than a single object as the
target. I did that when I
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that to do this right, we need to consider not only the status
quo but the trajectory. For example, suppose we have two tables to
process, one of which needs a wraparound vacuum and the other one of
which needs
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm worried about the case of a very, very frequently updated table
getting put ahead of a table that needs a wraparound vacuum, but only
just. It doesn't sit well with me to think that the priority of that
goes from
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
set_pglocale_pgservice() should be called?
I think that the command name
Anyway, this is getting way off track. The point is that the MS SDKs and
compilers are a bit of a mess and that MinGW support is useful because
we can't rely on them continuing to offer free SDKs and compilers in future.
Well, more compilers are always useful, but complaining that Microsoft
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2013 18:57, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Geoghegan peter.geoghega...@gmail.com writes:
I think we may be talking at cross purposes here. Guarantee may have
been too strong a word, or the wrong word entirely. All that I really
want here is for there to be a coding
Peter Geoghegan peter.geoghega...@gmail.com writes:
On 26 January 2013 22:36, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
BTW, one thing that struck me in a quick look-through is that the
ERRCODE_FOREIGN_KEY_VIOLATION patches seem to inconsistently send
either the PK or FK rel as the errtable. Is this
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a bug pending that autovacuum fails to give priority to
for-wraparound tables. When xid consumption rate is high and dead tuple
creation is also high, it is possible that some tables are waiting for
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Well I would think that we don't support droping several objects at
once yet in 9.3 is an acceptable answer.
On that point, I disagree.
Ok, will provide a patch for that soon, then. I did give higher priority
to exposing more information, ok to
Peter Geoghegan peter.geoghega...@gmail.com writes:
On 27 January 2013 18:57, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
However, this patch is not that, and mere documentation isn't going to buy a
thing here IMO. Especially not user-facing documentation, as opposed
to something that might be in a
I have a stress test of the of the WAL replay which panics the
database over and over again to make sure it recovers correctly.
This is in 9.3dev.
The test was eventually freezing up because of wraparound. The
problem was that, on fast enough hardware, the intentional crashes
were always
On 01/27/2013 02:48 PM, james wrote:
Anyway, this is getting way off track. The point is that the MS SDKs and
compilers are a bit of a mess and that MinGW support is useful because
we can't rely on them continuing to offer free SDKs and compilers in
future.
Well, more compilers are always
On 27 January 2013 17:11, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 25 January 2013 17:19, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
We
could easily run across a system where pg_class order happens to be
better than
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
I thought that template0 did not need vacuuming because everything in
it was frozen. But it looks like it does need vacuuming, and no one
but autovac can connect in order to do that vacuum.
Everything in it *should* be frozen, typically. My
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 23:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
If we were to try to defer writing the WAL until the page was being
written, the most it would possibly save is the small XLOG_HINT WAL
record; it would not save any FPIs.
How is the XLOG_HINT_WAL record kept small and why does it not
Hi,
Please find attached a new version of the patch, answering to most of
your reviewing points. I'll post another version shortly with support
for pg_dump and alter owner/rename.
The main priority was to confirm that the implementation is conforming
to the rought specs and design we agreed
On the contrary, only a few months ago there was a far from groundless fear
that Microsoft would do just that. Following considerable outcry they changed
their mind. But this is definitely not just paranoia. As for w64 support, the
mingw-64 project exists more or less explicitly to produce 64
On 01/27/2013 06:51 PM, james wrote:
On the contrary, only a few months ago there was a far from
groundless fear that Microsoft would do just that. Following
considerable outcry they changed their mind. But this is definitely
not just paranoia. As for w64 support, the mingw-64 project exists
Hi Noah,
On 27 January 2013 02:31, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
I did a few more benchmarks along the spectrum.
So that's a nice 27-53% improvement, fairly similar to the pattern for your
laptop pgbench numbers.
I presume that this applies to a tpc-b benchmark (the pgbench
default).
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:16:24AM +, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 27 January 2013 02:31, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
I did a few more benchmarks along the spectrum.
So that's a nice 27-53% improvement, fairly similar to the pattern for your
laptop pgbench numbers.
I presume
On 13-01-24 11:15 AM, Steve Singer wrote:
On 13-01-24 06:40 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Fair enough. I am also working on a user of this infrastructure but that
doesn't help you very much. Steve Singer seemed to make some stabs at
writing an output plugin as well. Steve, how far did you get
On 01/28/2013 02:15 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
I am not sure whether it's really true that a capability mechanism
could never really satisfy anyone. It worked for Linux.
I have no concern about using a capabilities approach for this, but I
don't think Linux is a great example here. Linux's
On 28 January 2013 03:34, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On the EBS configuration with volatile fsync timings, the variability didn't
go away with 15s runs. On systems with stable fsync times, 15s was no better
than 2s. Absent some particular reason to believe 5s is better than 2s, I
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
So if my understating is correct, 1)Tomas Vondra commits to work on
Windows support for 9.4, 2)on the assumption that one of Andrew
Dunstan, Dave Page or Magnus Hagander will help him in Windows
development.
Ok? If
On 28 January 2013 03:34, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
Would you commit to the same git repository the pgbench-tools data for the
graphs appearing in that blog post? I couldn't readily tell what was
happening below 16 clients due to the graphed data points blending together.
I'm afraid
On 09.01.2013 21:29, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 01/09/2013 01:08:39 PM, Jan Urbański wrote:
I actually still prefer to keep the signatures of
PLy_get_spi_sqlerrcode
and PLy_get_spi_error_data similar, so I'd opt for keeping the patch
as-is :)
I will send it on to a committer.
Looks good to me.
48 matches
Mail list logo
