Hello...
I haven't been subscribed in a while, but I've got an issue and am trying to
determine if the Right Way(tm) is the quickest way to fix it.
Basically, I have some very expensive stored procedures that determine whether
a user should have access to particular rows in a query (not a postgre
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:49:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Joe Conway kirjutas E, 10.03.2003 kell 05:35:
> >> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION array_push (anyarray, anyscalar)
> >> RETURNS anyarray
>
> > could you make it
> > RETURNS typeof($1)
>
> Not dir
First, a SOAP query should be posted in SOAP message format, not using the
query string as you do. Second, I like the idea of calling external SOAP
services, but consider creating a language 'soap' you could do with a CREATE
FUNCTION type thing. e.g.
CREATE FUNCTION "foo" (TEXT) RETURNS INTEGER A
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:36:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of course, CORBA has actually been quite formally standardized, suffers
> from many fairly interoperable implementations, and is rather a lot less
> bloated than any of the XML-based schemes. It might be worth trying,
> too...
T
I'm curious if anyone's considered adding logic to count actual disk/cache
hits to report for EXPLAIN ANALYZE so that we get a more apples-to-apples
comparison?
The other question is whether anyone has got scripts or tools or what not
for testing and getting accurate numbers for the following tuni
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:54:13AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have been planning to "test" the whole thing with a few .NET
> > applications. I am currently using expat to parse the output to ensure
> > that it all works correcty.
>
> That, unfortunately, probably implies that your imp
